fore gimplification?
Thanks,
Yoav Etsion
Hi Diego,
Diego Novillo wrote:
> Yoav Etsion wrote:
>
>
>>The problem is that the first mudflap pass takes place at the GIMPLE
>>level, at which point all variables have their
>>addressable/non-addressable attributes set, which forbids me to build an
>>ADD
tatistics about
program (or programmer) behavior.
Yoav
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Yoav Etsion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The transformation is simple: mudflap already injects a call to
__mf_register when an addressable variable is declared. I want to do
the same for all pointer variables [.
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Yoav Etsion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The pointer variable's address is used as the pointer's unique ID in
a database, collecting information about each pointer variable -
mostly its legal bounds. That way I can test when a pointer crosses
its
ers are used as addresses in
loads/stores (but this can probably be done by dataflow tracking
asm-to-asm filter).
Thanks,
Yoav Etsion
