On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 01:07, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
> ># define array_length(arr)(std:size(arr))
>
> C++ programmers will not accept a macro for this.
..in other words, the C++17 version of it needs to be an inline
function that returns std::size of an array,
not a macro. All
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:46, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> On 22/09/20 12:25 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> >Is there really a reason to want a nonstandard macro like this to do
> >something that's already trivial to do in the base language and has a
> >standard idiom (sizeof x / sizeof *
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 10:16, Richard Biener via Libstdc++
wrote:
> > Why not change this to:
> >
> > > if (present)
> > > ptr = gfc_build_conditional_assign_expr (
> > > block, present, ptr, nullarg);
> > >
> >
> > I think
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:54, Liu Hao via Libstdc++
wrote:
> As you can see, qualified names in C++ can grow up to ~100 characters quite
> frequently. This may
> deteriorate when `typename` and `template` are sometimes required. I don't
> think there is
> practically a set of rules which governs
Giacomo wrote:
>Stallman cannot betray Free Software AND get away with it.
>So to me (and to many others) Stallman is a sort of a living warranty.
That's fine. He doesn't need to be in the GCC SC to do that.
He can continue to provide guidance on the spirit of Free Software
without having an SC p
>However, the FSF does NOT control nor own the GNU project. That appears
to be a very common misperception.
>The FSF offers various pro-bono services to the GNU project, among them
guarding some GNU assets for the GNU project, but the GNU project is an
independent (unincorporated) organization, w
Huge apologies for mis-sending this to gcc-patches,
my email client makes suggestions when I attempt
to send to a gcc list. :D
The actual suggestion is at the end; skip straight to it if you wish.
>Im glad there are people like you on the project Eric, because you express
exactly what a lot of pe
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 15:46, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > The "small minority of developers" you speak of sure
> > seems to consist of developers who are not in the minority
> > considering how much they _actually contribute_ to the project.
>
> Due to their being paid for the work. Have no dou
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 16:22, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Many do not contribute because they do not have time, resources or support.
Yes? And? Even if GCC detaches itself from FSF, those who can contribute will
continue to contribute. And those who talk about contributing but
don't contribute
wi
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 19:01, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:49 AM Christopher Dimech via Gcc
> wrote:
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 1:03 AM
> > > From: "Ville Voutilainen"
> > > To: "Christopher Dimech"
> > > Cc: "GCC Development"
> > > Subject: Re: A suggestion
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> I do not see people really intending to fork. It explains why detractors
> have gone berserk.
I appreciate your colorful exaggerations, but I should point out that
the libstdc++
maintainer has stated his intention to fork, in unambigous t
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:49, Richard Kenner wrote:
>
> > Depends on the use cases. Not in military surveillance. And certainly not
> > at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. At Boeing could be the same, but
> > I'm not sure. Before 2011, rather than building things from scratch,
> > washi
12 matches
Mail list logo
