ster.
- Pre-registration9 April to 1 May 2007
- Notification of selected15 May 2007
participants
- Final registration 22 May 2007
- Website http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday/gcc-workshop
Uday Khe
inside MEM[...] of tree t is
POINTER_TYPE to TREE_TYPE(t).
Is is correct? It is general enough?
Thanks and regards,
Uday.
--------
Dr. Uday Khedker, Professor
Department of Computer Science & Engg.
IIT Bombay, P
any way to tell GCC that a given field should be
preserved so that it can be accessed in LTO mode?
Thanks and regards,
Uday.
Dr. Uday Khedker, Professor
Department of Computer Science & Engg.
IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai
On 07/28/2015 08:10 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 28, 2015 4:37:15 PM GMT+02:00, "Uday P. Khedker"
wrote:
Richard Biener wrote on Tuesday 28 July 2015 01:12 PM:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Uday Khedker
wrote:
We have added a new field (bool ptr_arith in struct tre
On 07/28/2015 01:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
As Jakub said this is not the full story if you factor in type-based
aliasing. Also
you of course have to account for the offset in operand 1.
Okay. We understood the details after a bit of reading.
For statement involving MEM[...], TREE_TYPE (
On 07/29/2015 02:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>If it matters: We are using gcc-4.7.2 and using the option
>-flto-partition=none.
Ugh. I don't remember the details in gcc 4.7 - the way streaming works has
completely changed since then (well, the basics are still in
tree-streamer-{in,out}.c)
So
On 08/12/15 20:08, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Uday P. Khedker wrote:
Richard Biener wrote on 12/03/2015 03:32 PM:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Uday P. Khedker
wrote:
We are implementing points-to analysis
enthusiastic participation.
Thanks and regards,
Uday Khedker.
(GCC Resource Center)
--
--
Dr. Uday Khedker
Professor
Department of Computer Science & Engg.
IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India.
email : u...@cse.iitb.ac.in
home
.
--
Dr. Uday Khedker
Professor
Department of Computer Science & Engg.
IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India.
email : u...@cse.iitb.ac.in
homepage: http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday
phone : Office - 91 (22) 2576 7717
://www.cse.iitb.ac.in).
Dates:29 June to 3 July (Saturday to Wednesday) 2013.
Registration starts on: Wednesday 1 May 2013
Registration closes on: Friday, 31 May 2013
--
Dr. Uday Khedker
Professor
Department of Computer Science
-code-view.pdf.
Thanks and regards,
Dr. Uday Khedker
Professor
Department of Computer Science & Engg.
IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India.
Email : u...@cse.iitb.ac.in
Homepage: http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~uday
Phone :
Office -91 (22) 2572 2545 x
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:25 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
Hi Jan,
I think this is a very good example where we could all collaborate
(including binutils).
I'll leave your reply intact, so that Chandler (CC'd) can get a bit
more context. I'm copying him because he (and I believe Diego) had
m
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 09:30 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:25 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
Hi Jan,
I think this is a very good example where we could all collaborate
(including binutils).
I'll leave your reply intact, so that Chandler (CC'd) can get a bit
more c
On Saturday 13 October 2012 02:34 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
Somewhere it is mentioned that heap is handled conservatively. Does
it mean the algorithm can not disambiguate heap objects all all, or
it can but does not track pointer values stored in heap objects?
How about field sensitivity?
On Saturday 17 November 2012 08:34 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:03:33AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
It is my strong opinion that the best language to write a compiler in is
the language that it i
I wrote some time ago:
On Saturday 17 November 2012 09:12 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2012 08:34 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:03:33AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
First, C or C++ is not the best language to write a compiler in,
It is my
On Tuesday 20 November 2012 10:30 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
PS. LLVM has also a decisive documentation advantage w.r.t. GCC
What...? The last time I tried to do something with LLVM, the
internals docs were awful (full of kinda stuff,
usually just in the area I wa
rojects with limited reach.
Of course even in the presence of an official mandate, there is no
guarantee that things will change but we would not know until we have
tried :-)
Uday.
--------
Dr. Uday Khedker
Professor
Department
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 01:12 PM, Alec Teal wrote:
So in all seriousness, why GCC? I suppose the volume of LLVM/Clang stuff
saying how great it is is misleading? Please link GCCs half or write a
good few pages on it please. This is serious I'd love to read it and
know more of how the two
feel that if my program has any merit,
the GCC community would adopt it :-(
Uday.
Aldy Hernandez wrote, On Wednesday 23 January 2013 08:07 PM:
Uday Khedker writes:
I think we need to come out of the "documentation" mindset. No amount
of conventional documentation is going to hel
On Thursday 24 January 2013 12:39 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
I would like to take this training program to the next level but so long
it remains my personal baby, my funding agency does not feel that I have
accomplished much because they
Hi Richard,
I am trying to understand the full implications of your statement:
>> Yes, that's what I say. Any pointer that is dereferenced is first
>> copied to
>> an SSA name. Basically everything residing in memory first has to be
>> loaded to an SSA name before it can be dereferenced. That
On Thursday 24 January 2013 12:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Uday Khedker wrote:
I have been trying to do my stuff for a few years. We conduct a
programme called "Essential Abstractions in GCC" which is aimed at
taking a novice to a level from where she can do independent
exper
On Thursday 24 January 2013 02:32 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
This is very different from putting it as one among so many other things on
the wiki. Look at it from the view point of a newcomer. There are so many
OK, then. Reorganize
On Thursday 24 January 2013 03:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/24/2013 09:39 AM, Uday Khedker wrote:
I wasn't sure if taking responsibility automatically grants me the right
to change what others have put up and that is why I was seeking support
of the steering committee.
It's not a
On Monday 18 February 2013 09:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:07 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18 February 2013 13:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
What if the ".BSS" sect
26 matches
Mail list logo
