Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-05 Thread Todd Vierling via Gcc
> One possible improvement would be to append "t32" if you want 32-bit > time_t, instead of appending "t64" for 64-bit time_t. Versioned symbols in glibc should mean that old binaries will still run (even if they misbehave when they look at the system time), just like with most previous ABI chan

Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition

2024-09-10 Thread Todd Vierling via Gcc
> This is all nice and good, but I would actually like to focus on realistic > targets (ie., ones which could be achieved significantly before 2038... :o) Right — there are distro releases shipping over the next few years which will still be deployed in production in 2038, so the clock is actuall