Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants

ase q for quad functions like sqrtq). I don't think this is a standard, but it is a precedent. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap

mendations on how to debug this problem? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c

the function address does appear to be aligned on a 256 byte boundry, the function descriptor has its normal 8 byte alignment. My question is, should function descriptors have the same alignment as functions or is this just an invalid test on systems that use function descriptors? Steve Ellcey [E

Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c

> Feel free to either (a) #ifdef out the first part of the test on IA64, > or (b) delete the first part of the test altogether. Since it fails on other platforms (b) seems like the better alternative. OK to checkin this patch? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 Steve Ellcey &

Failing matrix tests

ims: 3, Flattened 3 dimensions mem_init () { Andrew, I cc'ed you because of this email <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-06/msg00232.html>, it mentions some matrix failures on MIPS when testing on the PTR-PLUS branch. I don't actually know if my failures are related to P

GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

se this test in gfortran.dg? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

ctive-target up? > Most of the effective target checks use C code. I think it's safe > to assume that the build or install tree being tested will always > have a C compiler available. OK. I wasn't sure if it should work or not. I certainly built C as well as C++ and Fortran

Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

options are required for the effective-target check. > > Janis Thanks, I'll change the order and see how things look in tonight's testing. Assuming it goes well I'll send an official patch tomorrow. Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Question about PR tree-optimization/32941, bootstrap failure, qsort

eue actually ever long enough that this would affect the compilation time? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc.dg/sms-antideps.c fails on IA64 (modulo scheduling problem)

e larger problem of possibly generating a subtract instruction on a register (count_reg) that does not allow that operation. Ideas or advise (or patches)? Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4