y language constructs(its name, what
namespace it is in, etc.)
XML format?
-
You can use the library for reading and writing. However, the xml format
is automatically derived from the object model,data field "isVirtual"
in class "BaseSpecifier" is called "BaseSpecifier.IsVirtual" in xml
files. Normal fields and pointer<>'s are attributes, element<>'s and
list<>'s are subnodes.
--
Stefan Strasser
compatible
with unprocessed source.
it does not read any variable alignment information(except c++ bitfield
size) and I don't see a reason to do that.
but in case you need that it can be added quite easily, search for
"Parse(object
--
Stefan Strasser
_s *) malloc (sizeof (struct dpmatrix_s));
AllocPlan7Body(hmm, 10);
for (i = 0; i < 60; i++) {
P7Viterbi(500, 10, hmm, mx->mmx);
}
}
--
Stefan Strasser
no "volatile" involved.
--
Stefan Strasser
ttp://www.gccxml.org
if you want to port gcc to another CPU or similar I'm sure there is some
backend-howto on gcc website, but gimple trees are not the right way.
there are more than one IRs in gcc so you need to be more clear. and
note that gcc debugging outputs are not designed to be processed.
--
Stefan Strasser
p here since it is a generational collector.
--
Stefan Strasser
> my project is change EDG's front-end to GCC's front-end because GPL
expect some work to do. gcc does some transformations while parsing
already, e.g. when calling virtual functions
--
Stefan Strasser
Mike Stump schrieb:
On Friday, April 1, 2005, at 08:48 AM, Stefan Strasser wrote:
if gcc uses more memory than physically available it spends a _very_
long time swapping
Swapping, what's that? Here's $20, go buy a gigabyte.
expect memory to become a problem again with the advent of
tual tables involved. are there any known performance bugs in this
area or should I file a PR?
any suggestions on how to simplify the testcase? (preprocessed is ~60k
lines)
--
Stefan Strasser
file a PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20733
--
Stefan Strasser
Andrew Pinski schrieb:
On Apr 2, 2005, at 6:12 PM, Stefan Strasser wrote:
gcc-Version 4.0.0 20041218 (experimental)
this 4.0.0 is almost 4 months old.
That is not a far comparison as there was speedups after that
and other bug fixes.
you're right, I wasn't prepared to do performance
bug on the list is
known to cause silent miscompilation of Qt, a very major package, and
it's not easy to know where the problem is.
what is the workaround to this?
(in the case the class the pointer target is a member of is a template
parameter, unlike in the PR test case)
--
Stefan Strasser
codes including STL, boost and
custom code including function bodies and I have never seen a
RANGE_EXPR. I suppose it's only used at later stages or only in other
language's frontends.
Regards,
--
Stefan Strasser
Nathan Sidwell schrieb:
Stefan Strasser wrote:
I don't know anything about fold but in general a c++ array in the
frontend is cv-qualified, not its elements.
this is untrue. the elements hold the qualification.
right
I have been processing large source codes including STL, boost and
custom
NNER;
// calc result
result=0;
for (int i = 0; i < OUTER; ++i)
for (int j = 1; j < INNER; ++j)
result += d[j]*d[j-1] + d[j-1];
}
else
exit(-1);
printf("result = %f\n",result);
return 0;
}
--- end testcase --
--
Stefan Strasser
edx
cmpl $1000, %eax
mulsd %xmm0, %xmm1
addsd %xmm1, %xmm0
addsd %xmm0, %xmm2
jne .L124
--
Stefan Strasser
(gc pages are released).
Thanks,
--
Stefan Strasser
not used at all(at least when compiling c++).
would it help to do leak checking on libiberty alloc functions or is
than done regularily anyway?
--
Stefan Strasser
18 matches
Mail list logo
