Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST)

2005-08-24 Thread Scott Gilbertson
> In the last 24 hours, something has gone in which makes > the GCJ interpreter "gij" abort on even simple "Hello World" > classes. For example, the "RuntimeCheck" program in > the Jacks testsuite: I had (probably) the same thing yesterday. Here's a backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x412d6ca1 in kill (

dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?

2005-11-18 Thread Scott Gilbertson
I originally posted this on the java list, but the suggestion was made that I post it here to see if somebody can help. My previous related posts to the java list (I was originally thinking I had two separate problems): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-11/msg00230.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?

2005-11-21 Thread Scott Gilbertson
> > Looking at the changes to unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c, I see that the parts of > > the code I've shown here were structured differently in the 4.0 branch > > (which works just fine for me with static builds). Maybe that's a clue. > > Um, I don't see that at all. I see some minor changes wrt abort,

Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?

2005-11-22 Thread Scott Gilbertson
> If you're seeing the difference between the tip of 4.0 and mainline, > perhaps something is going wrong with the 4.0 configure check, such > that this feature isn't being enabled? My snapshot of branch-4.0 pre-dates the change you described. > > Should I static link with a newer glibc (I'm assu