Hi,
I am trying to implement a prototype pass that instruments a function
to check for safe memory accesses. As a starting point I looked at
mudflap1 pass, in tree-mudflap.c and decided that I should write a
dummy pass ( very simple, but similar to mudflap) that instruments the
code to count the n
Sorry, my mistake. I initialized it with a value, and it appeared in
the .data. :)
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement a prototype pass that instruments a function
> to check for safe memory accesses. As a starting point I looked at
> mudflap1 pass, in tree-mudflap.c and decided that I should wr
Hi,
I have to run a pass which modifies the function types of all functions in a
a C file, by adding an extra parameter to each function. If this pass
runs like all other optimization passes, then this pass runs when each
function is being processed. So, for a prog like this:
int my_funct(in
Hello,
I am doing some code instrumentation for program memory access
validation using gcc-4.1 head.
For every assignment, p=q
I pass the address of the operands, "&p" and "&q" to an external
library function.
This works fine at O0, but at O1, some legitimate code gets optimized
away. In the dum
update started at block: -1
Number of blocks in CFG: 6
Number of blocks to update: 5 ( 83%)
=
On 11/18/05, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 18 November 2005 04:13, Prateek Saxena wrote:
>
> > At this point, the stmt:
> >
> > # VUSE
Hello,
I want to dump out all the c++ classes/structs and global data
structures defined in a given file scope or transaltion unit, as part
of the debug dumps in C-like syntax, from GIMPLE data structs. Is
there a TREE_VEC or BIND_EXPR_VARS that I can traverse through and get
all these ?
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Ralph Loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am very interested in seeing how this optimization can remove
> > arithmetic overflows.
>
> int foo (char * buf, int n)
> {
> // buf+n may overflow of the programmer incorrectly passes
> // a large val
