On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:51:06AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> But seriously, I think we need to press autoconf into generating 100x
> faster code 90% of the time. Maybe prebundling answers for the
> common targets...
Ek, imake! :-)
Every time I've played with precomputing cache answers
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:03 am, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > I though that #gcc on oftc.net was more active, anyway, or has this
> > changed?
>
> This was more of a request for the #gcc on freenode to catch up with the r
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:07:33PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Please name such systems. We can then know to not use them, and can
> > document in the manual they are broken if we wish.
>
> IIRC the Windows cut-n-paste cuts a rectangle, not as-printed.
Yes, to this day, even using their la
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:58:11AM +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Joern RENNECKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S.: When I use a diff-cmd with -N, I not only get a diff for the 44
> > files that are different,
> > but also a header for each of the 752 files that are identical, i.e.
> > two line
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
>
> The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant complexity
> (ISO/IEC 14882:1998, pp. 461, Table 65), while the std::list::size() in
> current STL of GCC is defined as { std::distance(begin(), end()); }, whose
> complexiy is
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:17:42PM -0500, Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 07:42:35PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> >>
> >>The C++ standard said Container::size() should have constant
> >>comp
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:51:00PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 27/07/07, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >If you ask me, we should rename gcc@ to gcc-development@ and maybe rename
> > gcc-help@ to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ... gcc-dev@, keep gcc@ as an alias for gc
