GCC 6, compared to GCC 5, now emits an extra newline between error
messages. Is this intended?
$ cat error.c
int x = a;
int y = b;
$ gcc-5 error.c
error.c:1:9: error: ‘a’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int x = a;
^
error.c:2:9: error: ‘b’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int y
I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
being adequately addressed.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
>> being adequately addressed.
>
> But how do you want to address that?
The build step that invokes "ranlib libbackend.a" (which immediately
follows the invocation of "ar rc libbackend.a ...") takes over 7 seconds
on my machine and causes the entire 450MB archive to be rewritten. By
instead making the build system use ar rcs -- so that the archive and
its index are bu
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andrew Pinski writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> The build step that invokes "ranlib libbackend.a" (which immediately
>>> follows the invocation of "ar rc l
many as one can over the summer.
Would any of these ideas work as a GSoC project?
Regards,
Patrick Palka
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=search;s=ppalka;st=author
[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72443#c2
[3]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762#c7
[4]: ht
Hi Richard, Jakub and Martin,
First of all I'm sorry for the very late reply, and I will be more
punctual with my replies from now on.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:35 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:20 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >
> > On 3/4/19 6:17 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 5:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 3/3/19 4:06 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am very interested in working on GCC as part of GSoC this year. A few
> > years
> > ago I was a somewhat active code contributor[1] and unf
Hi everyone,
I noticed that the GCC build process currently only uses the
-Wmissing-prototypes flag, and not the -Wmissing-declarations flag.
It seems that the former flag only works on C source files, which
means that GCC's source files no longer benefit from this flag as they
are now C++ files.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 13 February 2014 20:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On a related note, would a patch to officially enable
>> -Wmissing-declarations in the build process be well regarded?
>
> What would be the advantage?
A missing decl
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 February 2014 10:02, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>>> On 13 February 2014 20:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>> On a related note, would a patch
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 February 2014 15:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> (I counted nearly 100 (non-debug)
>> functions that could be made static in gcc, and 4 in libstdc++, by the
>> way.)
>
> Which were the four in libstdc++?
>
.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header/type_traits
>
> Also, I would appreciate receiving the contact information for the
> project mentor, Patrick Palka.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ken Matsui
Hi Kritika,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:49 AM Kritika Rag via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
> I’m Kritika Rag, a Computer Science pre-final year undergraduate
> student from India. I’m quite passionate about web development and
> competitive programming and now I’m looking forward to contributin
14 matches
Mail list logo
