st want to point out that BUILT_IN_TM_START is missing in this
switch/case but I think I figure out why it is ok to not have it (except
in the case of nested transactions).
Thanks in advance for your time,
Patrick Marlier.
Inde
On 02/15/2011 05:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/15/2011 12:35 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
When I was looking at this problem of tail call optimization, I have
found that _ITM_abortTransaction was not considered as a 'noreturn'
function. Do you have any reason not doing this?
and feel free to ask questions.
Patrick Marlier.
nstrumentedCode,&txn_start_loc);
>> ++ .
>> ++_ITM_transactionId cur_id = _ITM_getTransactionId();
I do not understand that...
>> ++ Of course , It would be great to share the study and results with
>> you when I organize my study and all other things.
I guess we will meet together at the EuroTM meeting in Paris.
Patrick Marlier.
Dear Ismail,
On Fri, 6 May 2011, ismail wrote:
TinySTM 1.0 uses implicit transaction descriptor by default (same as
0.9.9) but you can compile it with EXPLICIT_TX_PARAMETER (Makefile) and
then the transaction descriptor is explicit.
But functions are the same from 0.9.9 to 1.0.0 so I don't reall
sage could help. Do not hesitate to complete the list (I
can try to have a look at it) or close bugs (I cannot do it).
I take the opportunity of this message to thank Richard, Aldy and
Torvald for the work done on trans-mem.
Patrick Marlier.
On 12/15/2011 03:07 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
on x86_64-apple-darwin11. While Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 don't
seem to be exhibiting those failures any more, I don't see any
analysis of the cause of the previous failures or fixes proposed to
address these. Did the problem just go latent on those t
Wonderful! Thanks Aldy.
On 12/21/2011 09:11 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
* ICE when lto1 does not have -fgnu-tm and object file uses TM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51280
I believe I wasn't able to reproduce this.
Arg really! For the openmp testcase, I was wrong but the tm testca
ppens?
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was fixed.
Thanks!
--
Patrick Marlier.
Index: trans-mem.c
===
--- trans-mem.c (rev
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was fixed.
What do you mean? Do you still see
9.html
-> Solaris: ?.
--
Patrick Marlier
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
On 01/10/2012 05:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Also outstanding is that the return value setup for beginTransaction
needs to be adjusted into the new block. I.e. we current generate
(set (reg eax) (call _ITM_beginTransaction))
(set (reg psuedo) (reg eax))
.Lrestart:
// rest of tm
renamed to simply itm.h?
Thanks!
--
Patrick Marlier.
anks for any help.
Patrick Marlier.#include
namespace bench
{
class LLNode
{
LLNode* next;
int data;
public:
__attribute__((transaction_safe))
LLNode(int val, LLNode* m_next)
{
data = val;
next = m_next;
}
__attribute__((transact
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> I'm currently implementing support for hardware transactional memory in
> the rs6000 backend for POWER8. Things seem to be mostly working, but I
> have run into a few issues I'm wondering whether other people are seeing.
It sound
#x27;-'.
$ curl
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-asm-with-goto.html\#Extended-asm-with-goto
Locally I have:
Is the version of texinfo buggy to generate online documentation?
Thanks,
--
Patrick Marlier
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
=== boehm-gc Summ
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors
On 02/23/2012 09:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
Hi,
Here the links about that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CopyrightAssignment
--
Patrick
On 08/02/2012 09:14 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please send me the copyright assignment forms for single
contributions and for all future contributions?
Cheers,
22 matches
Mail list logo
