Hi GCC community,
I have a question about pattern matching in match.pd.
So I have a pattern like this [1]:
#define CMP !=
bool f(bool c, int i) { return (c << i) CMP 0; }
bool g(bool c, int i) { return c CMP 0;}
It is verifiably correct to transfer f to g [2]. Although this pattern looks
simple
y, November 24, 2021 15:11
To: Navid Rahimi; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question about match.pd
On 11/24/2021 2:19 PM, Navid Rahimi via Gcc wrote:
> Hi GCC community,
>
> I have a question about pattern matching in match.pd.
>
> So I have a pattern like this [1]
Hi GCC community,
I have a few questions that I am struggling to find an answer for:
a. Why does LTO generates a new symbol?
b. Why it does not replace the existing symbol, instead of creating a new one
with "lto_priv.%d" at the end of it [1]?
c. Can we assume the original symbol always will be
