Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

2017-10-17 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/10/2017 04:04 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4, >> ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by >> gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we

Re: AIX vs long double

2011-02-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > AIX provides two versions of long double and declares all of the C99 > long double symbols in math.h header file. One implementation aliases > long double to IEEE double precision type and the other implementation > aliases long double to IBM's p

Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/31/11 19:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 31 October 2011 17:38, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Dennis Clarke writes: >> > I'm uncertain if Solaris 8/x86 still supports bare i386 machines, so it > might be better to keep the default of pentiumpro instead. Solaris 8 won't run on anyt

Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/02/11 12:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 November 2011 06:52, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> >> On 10/31/11 19:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On 31 October 2011 17:38, Rainer Orth wrote: >>>> Dennis Clarke writes: >>>> >>>>

Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/02/11 18:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 November 2011 13:52, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> >> Erm - what I want to say is that I would really wonder if it does have /any/ >> influence (binary-wise) to gcc on Solaris (unlike Linux) whether to configure >> fo

Re: # of unexpected failures 768 ?

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/02/11 19:07, Rainer Orth wrote: > Michael Haubenwallner writes: > >> Especially as i386 (from config.guess) is the default too. > > No, it's not, you're confusing the configure triplet with the default > 32-bit arch. Since GCC 4.6, the default for Solaris/

Re: dse2 remove wrong insn

2011-12-12 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 12/12/11 14:48, BELBACHIR Selim wrote: > Everything seems good when I use a union instead of "*((int *)(&af))". This casting variant rings a bell here, especially when it breaks with optimization but works as union: Does it make a difference when you compile with "-fno-strict-aliasing" ? /ha

Re: Deprecate 32-bits HP-PA for GCC 4.8?

2012-05-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 05/07/2012 07:33 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > I think it's reasonable to assume that most users of HP-UX10 on > machines with PA-RISC 2.0 support will have upgraded to HP-UX 11.11 or > later. While this may be true indeed, ... > 4. 32-bits HP-PA uses the SOM binary object format, i.e. it is a

Re: AIX trunk build fail #3

2012-10-22 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/22/2012 03:49 PM, Perry Smith wrote: > In stage 3, libatomic's configure fails. The config.log file is here: > https://gist.github.com/3931504 > > I've recreated the conftest.c and ran the same command. The output is fine > and executes with a 0 status. > > The clue (that I can't figu

Re: AIX trunk build fail #3

2012-10-22 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/22/2012 06:03 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Perry Smith wrote: >> In stage 3, libatomic's configure fails. The config.log file is here: >> https://gist.github.com/3931504 >> >> I've recreated the conftest.c and ran the same command. The output is fine >> a

Re: CPATH, LIBRARY_PATH, and cross-compilers

2013-02-14 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 02/14/2013 04:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> At any rate, there’s a need for similar env. vars for cross-compilers. WDYT? > I am having difficulties to imagine such a need. Indeed: I've experienced that environment variables are fine to test something out, but open a can of worms when used