Hello,
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:3:5: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10540
Hello Marek,
On 25/11/2014 09:47, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Mason wrote:
This ICE may have gotten lost in the noise of my own message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00094.html
(The code snippet might be invalid C)
$ gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -S
On 25/11/2014 10:27, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Mason wrote:
Aaah, you want me to post the bug report to BZ, not here...
Yep - the snippet + command-line options you posted was enough to reproduce
the bug. The GCC mailing list is not for reporting bugs
Hello everyone,
Consider the following program.
#include
#include
struct foo1 { char s[80]; };
struct foo2 { char s[80]; } __attribute__ ((aligned (64)));
struct bar1 { struct foo1 f; int i; };
struct bar2 { struct foo2 f; int i; };
#define P(arg) printf("sizeof(" #arg ") = %u\n", (unsigned)si
On 29/03/2015 17:35, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Mason wrote:
>
>> Consider the following program. [snip]
>
> This mailing list is about the development of gcc, for user questions
> please use gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org instead.
Thanks, I will re-send my original message to gcc-h
re that I can disable the whole mechanism with -freestanding, but I
don't want to cripple the optimiser.
Regards,
Tom Mason
:p
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:37 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Tom Mason wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've got a project here: https://github.com/wheybags/
> glibc_version_header
> > which uses .symver directives to link to a specified version of glibc
Actually, never mind, it's working fine:
https://gist.github.com/wheybags/b7e4152daf76c72503e9e1f52f3dca3d and I
have some other problem.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Tom Mason wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure I understa
on a system with glibc 2.13 installed. If I force it to an earlier version
however, then it'll work just fine.
On Jan 29, 2018 9:05 PM, "Andi Kleen" wrote:
> Tom Mason writes:
>
> > Is there any way for me to force the version for these symbols aswell?
>
> It see
Hello,
The following code is rejected by one compiler, while it is accepted by gcc
without any warning. Several people in comp.lang.c seem to think that it is a
bug in the first compiler which should ***not*** reject the program.
Message-ID:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/browse_frm/
10 matches
Mail list logo
