toolchain myself
from source, but if you happen to know of a site with
binaries for the SB1 under Linux, I wouldn't be
horribly opposed.
Jonathan Day
__
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
ntoo
would be nicer, as that doesn't need a pre-existing
system, but Gentoo don't do MIPS64 distributions.
Jonathan Day
--- Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Further to Eric's good advice:
>
> Do you already have access to a mips64 version of
> glibc?
--- Kai Ruottu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, Jonathan, if you need to get a knife (glibc)
for
>producing your own hammer (gcc), just ask someone to
>give that knife and produce your own hammer first
with
>that borrowed knife. And then produce your own knife
>using your self-made hammer and late
the case. I decided to backtrack to the glibc that
works, according to the LFS, and have classed the
status of Glibc for MIPS64 as uncertain.
--- Daniel Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Day wrote:
> > Crosstool, for example, only supports 32-bit MIPS
> -
> > and
Ok, I -think- I've found one problem.
Identifying the processor as an SB1 may be producing a
confused result.
Both binutils and glibc's configure scripts will see
it as a mips32, because it does not start off with
mips64 in the name.
However, GCC's configure scripts expands the name to
mipsisa64
