tions in real.c to 'do the right thing' for
radix 10 reals. I could add a field to real_value to point to a
function table, that if present to be called through. Or simply add
various "if (r->b == 10) checks throughout real.c. Or other.
Thoughts/concerns/questions/advice?
Best Regards,
Jon Grimm
IBM Linux Technology Center.
ed in (and to validate that my thinking was not totally off kilter). The specific internal representation can change once real.c is safe for some different representation.
--
Jon Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Diego Novillo wrote:
I see no changes in libstdc++ since the previous run and nothing
in the C++ FE, so I'm not sure whether it may be something broken
in my box.
Anybody else seeing this failure?
Yep. I see this here on the PPC64 nightly autotester.
Br, Jon
