I have a situation where I have a class that internally maintains a
container object of non-const objects that it wants to publish to
clients as a const container of const objects, that is, clients can't
modify the list or the items in the list. The data member wants to be
non-const because th
Shouldn't the last (optional) argument be (1) const and (2) a reference
(rather than a potentially very expensive copying call-by-value)? Among
other things, if you have a type declared with alignment attributes, it
will fail on this. I notice the MSVC implementation has (1) but not
(2). I c
