On 11/02/2009 10:29 PM, Justin Mattock wrote:
> [ 532.942324] cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0,
> oom_adj=0
> [ 532.942330] Pid: 16002, comm: cc1plus Tainted: P
> 2.6.32-rc5-00083-g04ea458 #2
> [ 532.942333] Call Trace:
> [ 532.942342] [] T.417+0x7c/0x245
> [ 532.942347]
On 11/02/2009 11:02 PM, Justin Mattock wrote:
> Now with this oom-killer I'm
> hitting this on an imac9,1 with
> gcc (GCC) 4.5.0 20091029 (experimental)
So there is probably a leak in the gcc chain. Does this happen with a
stable gcc version?
On 11/04/2009 07:44 AM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> as for compiling: libc compiled fine, kernel fine,
> and every package on the clfs list up to boot up the fresh system.
It might be pretty c++ only, I think.
On 11/08/2008 04:46 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Jiri" == Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jiri> while compiling slightly augmented cc1, I've found a poison
> Jiri> pragma bug. Here comes a trimmed example of the bug:
>
> Jir
Hi,
while compiling slightly augmented cc1, I've found a poison pragma bug. Here
comes a trimmed example of the bug:
$ echo -e '#pragma GCC poison malloc\nstruct { int malloc; };'|gcc - -E
-o/dev/null
:2:14: error: attempt to use poisoned "malloc"
On 11/11/2008 02:00 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Jiri" == Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jiri> I want to extend cpp to extract some more info (for backward
> Jiri> mapping from preprocessed_code into source_code+line+column)
>
