Using binutils 2.15.96 and gcc 3.4.3... where have I gone wrong?
-Jason
gcc -c -g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wold-style-definition -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE-I.
-Ibuild -I../../
insn-conditions.c:97: error: `flag_unsafe_math_optimizations' undeclared
here
Using binutils 2.15.96 and gcc 3.4.3... where have I gone wrong?
Of course if I would have searched the archives first, I would know
that I need a new gawk most likely. [argh]
-Jason
A little humor from a long time ML lurker...
Via C3-2 Nehemiah 1GHz 512MB ddr
$ ../gcc-4.0.0/configure --prefix=/home/jason/local/gcc-400 --enable-shared
\
--enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --enable-long-long
--enable-__cxa_atexit \ --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-libunwind-exceptions
--e
I suspect this line is the source of your problems:
friend T* func(T* p);
Y isn't a template parameter here, but a (concrete?) class named "Y".
The below compiles with 3.4.3 anyways...
Regards,
-Jason
// Line 1
class A {
public:
A() { };
~A() { };
};
class B {
public:
B();
B(const A&
Any notable ABI changes from 9 to 10?
Thanks!
-Jason
(Sorry for asking here, there was no response from gcc-help in January.)
Web search shows that -Wmaybe-uninitialized is an imprecise check, and that
boost::optional is already a known sore spot, but I wanted to pass along this
small test case in case the warning's owner wanted to do further improvements.
We solved our one grumpy instance with auto x = make_optio
Been doing stability testing on my x86_64 Ryzen cpu using openSUSE's
(Tumbleweed) "gcc7.1.1 20170802" + compiling Linux kernel source. Every so
often, the build curiously stalls on a futex between cc1 and as. cc1 is on the
futex. as is waiting to read. Could that hang be related to what's be
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>while ((*(q++))-- == 0) ;
Is that defined and legal?? Is q incremented before or after *q is
decremented? They are both post operators!
Jason Mancini
_
Rediscover Hotmail®: Get e-mail storag
> Status
> ==
> GCC 4.8.1 has been released, the branch is again open
> for regression bugfixes and documentation fixes.
> GCC 4.8.2 could be tentatively released in early September.
Curious user is curious about 4.8.2 status! :^)
