On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:52 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Over at RTEMS, we ran into a case where the C++ atomics may not be right
> for one of the lower level x86 models. We will investigate whether it can
> be made right but this has led to the discussion of dropping older models
> and set
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 4:13 PM Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> For example, for Fortran code like:
>
> write (*,*) "Hello world"
>
> ..., 'gfortran' creates:
> The issue: the stack object 'dt_parm.0' is a half-KiB in size (yes,
> really! -- there's a lot of state in Fortran I/O apparently).
> Any
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:15 AM FX Coudert wrote:
>
> > I regenerate auto* files from time to time for libgfortran. Regenerating
> > them has always been very fragile (using --enable-maintainer-mode),
> > and difficult to get right.
>
> I have never found them difficult to regenerate, but if you
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 8:59 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
> >
> >> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
> >>> There used to be access to an AIX system on the co
