Re: git conversion in progress

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 09:55, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Hi, the front page reads "Our sources are readily and freely available >> via SVN...", similar recommendation for SVN in > Yes, it's been said more than once that the web pages will be updated >

Re: [wwwdocs] Generalize instructions and remove notes on repository mirroring via rsync.

[ gcc-patches -> gcc ] On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Remove all references how to perform local checkouts, to SVN, and > mirroring the repository. Instead generalize descriptions since > with the move to Git syncing the repository with rsync and then > checking out

Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.)

On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote (on gcc-patches@): > With Git a clone carries the whole repository, so remove instructions > on obtaining a local copy of the repository and related instructions > on SVN usage. I just updated https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/reghunt.html , mostly by

Re: New redirects for git

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Thanks to everybody who have helped with this. Thank you for putting this in place, Jakub! Gerald

Re: Updating "regression hunting" to the Git world (was: [wwwdocs] Adjustments of "regression hunting" instructions to the post-SVN world.)

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> If you have further updates to that page, please go ahead and >> simply make them (or let me know). > It still says "The following SVN commands are ..." Yes, that's another piece I'll tackle today/tomorrow. >> Also contrib/reghunt appears in need of

Re: git conversion in progress

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > In addition, once git.html is more complete (has the list of branches > added, at least) we need to update the GCC home page to link to the new > pages in place of those for SVN, redirect the old pages to the new ones, > and generally update references

Re: Add News-feed item for git transition

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > We're missing a statement on the main news feed about the git transition. Lovely, thanks. Gerald PS: Lovely referring to you creating the patch, not the missing announcement. ;-)

Re: git conversion in progress

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> The rsync.html page can be removed too, since that was a way to download >> the entire svn repo. With git clone, you get the entire repo, so rsync >> isn't needed anymore. > I disagree, it isn't just about downloading a svn repo, but mailing list > arch

[committed] wwwdocs: New GCC mirror from Rabat, Morocco

On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Happy to have you as a mirror, and if you'd like to submit a patch > for https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html that'd be great. Otherwise we > can create one. I applied this patch that I created on behalf of Sa

Re: List-Id header being stripped

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Florian Weimer wrote: > So the difference is > > List-Id: > > vs > > List-Id: Gcc mailing list > > I guess now you need to perform a substring match. Or remove the string. Is that doable? (It does not add value, and "Gcc" is wrong spelling anyway.) Gerald

Re: text/x-* attachments strippe

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Thomas König wrote: > I also seem to have missed all discussion on this change (if there was > anything). I do not understand why such a huge change was implemented > that way, and who did this. Perhaos the person(s) responsible could > speak up about this. Let's be careful

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers wrote: > Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs. > Further, URLs such as > > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev > https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456 > > are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the ma

0800-GIT-HELP: Doing a simple backport

I hope the offer by some of you to support people like me who Git appears to hate with a fervor still stands? ;-) And I volunteer to enhance our documentation if it appears useful. Usecase: I've got a patch approved and pushed to HEAD, and approved for active release branches - 13a46321516e2efd

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > The libstdc++ manual is written in Docbook XML, but we commit both the > XML and generated HTML pages to Git. Sometimes a small XML file can > result in dozens of mechanical changes to the generated HTML files, > which we record in the Ch

arm-related links in need of updates

I noticed there's a couple of links on arm.com that changed recently (probably in the last month or so). Can you please help and get those updated? (Even those that redirect.) On http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/changes.html https://developer.arm.com/docs/101028/0009/data-processing-intrinsics

More consistency for Git log messages?

Having spent a bit more time with GCC sources (as opposed to wwwdocs) recently and looking for prior art to guide me, I noticed there's a lot of options to specific the ChangeLog file(s) to use. And correspondingly a lot of inconsistency. Right now we seem to allow for 1. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2.

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, FX via Gcc wrote: > I’m trying to bootstrap a GCC 10 compiler on macOS with clang, and I am > getting errors in stage 1, because there is C++11 code that is rejected > by clang (because the bootstrap involves compiling stage 1 with > -std=gnu++98, online on master (see top-l

libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/backwards_compatibility.xml

I noticed this section on "Backwards Compatibility" in the libstdc++ docs that talks about - glibc 2.0.x - GCC 3.2 (August 2002) - GCC 4.1 (February 2006) and links to "Migrating to GCC 4.1" and "Migration guide for GCC-3.2" documents. Does this still make sense (and serve real users or deve

Re: RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee (was: Remove RMS...)

On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > Oh well, sure, but luckily the solution is just as fast and easy as > it was to remove RMS: pick just one person for each nationality and > remove the others. Why nationalities? That strikes me as a rather specific view focusing on one of many attributes

Re: GCC association with the FSF

On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Richard Kenner via Gcc wrote: > I really think that most of the people replying on this thread have a > much more encompassing view of "GCC governance" than actually exists. There are a number of people arguing here who have contributed little to nothing to GCC, whose names e

Re: GCC association with the FSF

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > GCC is clearly an US-only project. This is simply incorrect. > A US-corporate one. Totally SFW (in the US). As is this. > This is not intended as an insult. > It's just a fact. Ex falso quodlibet. Gerald

Re: GCC association with the FSF

On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > In fact, the mail boxes of the Steering Committee's members are > stored on their corporate servers. You keep making statements which are simply wrong. None of my GCC-related e-mails touch the servers of my employer, nor servers under the control of my

Re: removing toxic emailers

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, Frosku wrote: > In my view, if people employed by a small number of American companies > succeed in disassociating GCC from GNU/FSF, which is representative of > the free software grassroots community I find this insistant focus by some on "American companies" interesting - a

Re: Documentation complex logarithm https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html

On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, C.Friedrich wrote: > The LOG function returns the principal value of the complex logarithm > whose imaginary part omega must be in the range -pi < omega <= pi. > > GFORTRAN does it correctly but the online documentation > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/LOG.html gives -

Re: Errors Summary

On Mon, 11 May 2015, 18d53b+c826wv11dt...@guerrillamail.com wrote: > Is there an option to print out a summary of line numbers with > errors/warnings? Example output: > > > main.cpp : 2, 3, 17 > lex.cpp : 4, 6, 8 > > I often don't need an error message to fix the error, so this would save > me

Andreas Tobler appointed FreeBSD maintainer (was: FreeBSD users of gcc)

A while ago Loren James Rittle, who had been taking care of GCC on FreeBSD for many years and brought the port to modern standards, wrote the following on this list: >> I am the named maintainer of the freebsd port. I have been for >> approximately twelve years; although I haven't been very

[wwwdocs] PATCH forRe: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list

On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Gerald, I think we've had similar issues with these mirrors in the > past as well, shall we just remove them from the list? > >> http://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - Online Shop >> ftp://mirrors-ru.go-parts.com/gcc - bad >> rsync://mirrors-ru.go-parts.c

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Advertisement in the GCC mirrors list, again

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, niXman wrote: > mirrors.webhostinggeeks.com/gcc/ This is a little disappointing, though I am inclinded to consider it a genuine mistake/migration. Addressed like this. Gerald Index: mirrors.html === RCS file: /

Re: missing explanation of Stage 4 in GCC Development Plan document

fOn Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Richard Biener wrote: >>> Stage 2 has been missing for 7 years now, Stages 3 and 4 seem to blur >>> together, the "regression only" rule is more like "non-invasive fixes >>> only" (likewise for the support branches). >> Don't stage3 and stage4 differ in that substantial change

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC Mirror

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Scott Haiden wrote: > The US, Saint Louis mirror (http://gcc.petsads.us) seems to host only > ads. I am not sure if this is a mistake on their part or if they're > aware of it or not, but I figured I'd let somebody know just in case. I do hope it's just a mistake and wasn't

Some real-life feedback on -Wmisleading-indentation

Compiling Wine with GCC trunk (to become GCC 6) I noticed four dozen of warnings triggered by -Wmisleading-indentation. Some are simply weird formatting, some may be indicative of real issues -- and I have started to look into them one by one and submitting patches (to Wine). However, there is

Re: C/C++ standards supported by the preprocessor

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > I noticed that the section on preprocessor options in the GCC manual > (which is also shared by the CPP manual) still claims that the default > -std= values are gnu90 for C and gnu++98 for C++, and does not list any > C++ versions after gnu++98. AF

Re: 'current' in URLs of mailing list archives not redirecting to 2016-02

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Keith Lindsay wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/current/ > currently redirects to > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/ > instead of > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/ Thanks for the report, Keith. This appears fixed now. I also verified this for a couple of other mailin

Re: [WWWDocs] Deprecate support for non-thumb ARM devices

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > I propose to commit this patch later this week. + Support for revisions of the ARM architecture prior to ARMv4t has + been deprecated and will be removed in a future GCC release. + This affects ARM6, ARM7 (but not ARM7TDMI),

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Please remove mirror2.babylon.network

On Sun, 28 Feb 2016, NOC wrote: > Due to reorganization of the mirror servers we will be taking the > following mirror offline. Could you please remove it from the list? > > http://mirror2.babylon.network/gcc/ | ftp://mirror2.babylon.network/gcc/ > | rsync://mirror2.babylon.network/gcc/ Thank you

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Change in mirror setup

On Fri, 6 May 2016, NOC wrote: > We have changed our mirror server setup. > > Could you please update the mirror list and replace: > > France, Gravelines: http://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/ | > ftp://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/ | > rsync://mirror0.babylon.network/gcc/, thanks to Tim Semeijn > (

Re: Switch to ISL 0.16.1

Hi Richi, On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > the following patch switches download_prerequesites to use ISL 0.16.1 > (just put that into infrastructure/). > > I've verified it works for me (on the gcc-5 branch and trunk). > > Ok? I did not see any responses, nor the patch committed, a

Re: gcc-4.9-20160803 is now available

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, gccad...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160803 is now available on > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160803/ > and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. Is it possible you missed installing the updated maintainer-scripts/cron

Re: Mirror out of date

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, NightStrike wrote: > The mirror here: > > ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/releases/ > > Does not have gcc 6 from April. And looking at ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/gcc/snapshots/ it appears the mirroring stopped end of February/beginning of March. Dan, can you please

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: New CA mirror

Hi Tim, On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, Tim Semeijn wrote: > We have added a new mirror in Canada. > > IP address is being geolocated in the US but it is actually Canadian. If > it has to be listed as a US mirror please let me know. thanks for the heads up! Below is the patch that I just applied, mirroring

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC Coding Conventions typo

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Chris Gregory wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ExternC > > In the `Extern "C"` commentary, the coding conventions says: > > Definitions within the body of a namespace are not indented. > > This should read > > Definitions within the body of an `ex

Re: Release notes for GCC 7?

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Joseph Myers wrote: > Is there a reason there's no changes.html for GCC 7 at this point? None, apart from me missing it and http://gcc.gnu.org/releasing.html as well. Segher beat me to it now (I was planning to do it tonight); let me know whether there is anything else I ca

Re: onlinedocs formated text too small to read

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Jon Grant wrote: > Thank you. I filled a PR now: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 Thanks you! And sorry that this somehow fell through the cracks. I have now adjusted our web site to use our global CSS for the online documentation (and we can hence easil

Re: ARC's pending patches

Hi Claudiu, On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote: > Until GCC steering committee will take a decision about ARC's > maintainer can you please share some more background on this? I do not recall any conversation around this at the steering committee. The GCC MAINTAINERS file still list

Re: doc maintainer questions

[ Old e-mail alert ] On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, David Wohlferd wrote: > I have been discussing adding some content to the basic asm docs. As part of > this work, I want to add a discussion of "How to convert basic asm to extended > asm." However it doesn't seem like this is a good fit for the User Guid

-Wformat-length and floats

This took me a bit to get to the bottom of, but I know believe that we need to work both on the documentation and implementation of -Wformat-length, in particular when it comes to floats. #include typedef struct M { float a, b, c; } M; char *foo(M *m) { static char buf[64]

Re: New GCC Mirror

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016, mirr...@letterboxdelivery.org wrote: > We're supporters of your project and have created a mirror. > > Location: Tokyo, Japan > > Mirror: http://gcc.letterboxdelivery.org (http) | > rsync://gcc.letterboxdelivery.org/gcc (rsync) > > Mirror contact email: mirr...@letterboxdeli

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

On Tue, 6 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote: > All done… It is in. Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds fail as follows: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

On Sat, 10 May 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Since (at least) 16:40 UTC that day my i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 builds > fail as follows: > > Comparing stages 2 and 3 > warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs > warning: gcc/cc1pl

Re: we are starting the wide int merge

On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote: > To rule out one possibility: which GCC are you using for stage1? I think that may the smoking gun. When I use GCC 4.7 to bootstrap, FreeBSD 8, 9 and 10 all build fine on i386 (= i486) and amd64. When I use the system compiler, which is GCC 4.2 on F

RE: broken links?

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: > you are right - must be a Firefox problem; I had no problem using wget, IE8 > works as well > Firefox is still redirected to https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ > though Does it work for you know? We made a number of changes in the la

RE: broken links?

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote: > I tested from home to reach https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ Well, that is not supposed to be there to begin with. The original report was about links to ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ not working from https://gcc.gnu.or

Re: netgull.com mirror doesn't have gcc release .sig files.

On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: > there are no .sig files here: > > http://www.netgull.com/gcc/releases/gcc-4.8.2/ > > i assumed that gcc didn't use gpg for releases, and became very > discouraged about the idea of building gcc from source. > > then i noticed that there are .sig f

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: New French mirror

Hi Tim, On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tim Semeijn wrote: > I have set up a French gcc mirror. It is located in Roubaix, France. isn't that where they like to torture bikes (and riders) once a year? ;-) > It is reachable through http, ftp and rsync: > > http://mirror.bbln.nl/gcc > ftp://mirror.bbln.nl/gc

Re: broken links?

Hi Martin, On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Martin Liška wrote: > More precisely, webkit based browsers have problems with combination of http > and https links for the same site, > Chrome console error from https://gcc.gnu.org/: > > [blocked] The page at 'https://gcc.gnu.org/' was loaded over HTTPS, but ran

Re: PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction)

Hi Dan, I see there is a later mail from Steven which I'm going to look into wrt. adding the mirrors. There seems to be a number of you looking into mirroring?? Gerald On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Dan D. wrote: > I made a small mistake below on the ftp/rsync mirrors for the USA > mirror. They should b

build/genmodes: config/i386/i386-modes.def:25: (TF) field format must not be set

I've been looking for a smoking gun, but did not find one. Interestingly this only happens in stage3 on i386-unknown-freebsd10.0 where clang is the bootstrap compiler: build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h build/genmodes: config/i386/i386-modes.def:25: (TF) field format must not be set build/genmodes:

Re: Binary packages for Solaris

On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Tom Christensen wrote: >> I just noticed that on the page with the list for binary packages for >> Solaris at >>https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html >> the distributions „Blastwave“ and „SunFreeware“ are still listed. >> Blastwave has closed its doors some month ago an

Re: Please Update the Installing GCC: Binaries Page

On Wed, 23 May 2012, Colin Prior wrote: > Please would you be good enough to update > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html and add www.unixpackages.com > We as you will see from the Sunfreeware site we have removed the majority of > our packages including GCC (Solaris 2.5, 2.6 7, 8, and 9) over

[wwwdocs] Patch for Re: PLEASE RE-ADD MIRRORS (small correction)

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Dan D. wrote: > Are you still interested in the mirrors? Yep. This is the patch I just committed to our web site. If there are further updates, best propose a patch against https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html , that is the fastest way and ensure things show up as you want them

Re: Mirror Setup

Hi Timo, On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Timo Jacob wrote: > Hi, I have set up new mirrors for GCC for the following locations: : > + Mirrors-usa: > http://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/crux/ > ftp://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/crux/ > rsync://mirrors-usa.go-parts.com/mirrors/crux/ these did not loo

gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html (was: Question for ARM person re asm_fprintf)(

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > The page is > unfortunately out of date (e.g. binutils+sim now lives in the > same git repo) but it gives you the idea. Sooo, any volunteer to update this page? Doesn't have to be perfect, even incremental i

GCC 5 fallout: libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc

Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues due to the version number change. One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc. Shouldn't that be libgcj-5.pc now? Gerald

--with-sse2 by default (was: GCC version bikeshedding)

On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Geert Bosch wrote: > Can we use the switch to 5.0, a supposedly stable C++11 ABI etc, > also as an excuse to finally configure for --with-sse2 by default > for 32-bit x86? Maybe then we can finally retire PR 323 and its > dozens of duplicates... I did not see a response to t

[wwwdocs] Patch for Re: _contribute.html_: missing information regarding feedback procedure

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> At the very bottom of the above page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), >> there is no indication of GCC only accepting *plain text* messages. > That would belong on http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html but it could be > improved, as it only says "Please r

PATCH for Re: New GCC mirror

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, ConcertPass Mirrors Admin wrote: > we set up a new GCC mirror for the community. > > URL: http://mirrors.concertpass.com/gcc/ > Organization/Contact: ConcertPass (ad...@mirrors.concertpass.com) > Location: United States, Michigan > > Please, add it to your mirror list page.

libcc1 still breaks bootstrap (with clang as system compiler)

Now the error is gone on my nightly FreeBSD test systems, I am getting the following: In file included from /scratch2/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/libcc1/plugin.cc:58: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:438: In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/cwchar:107: In file included from /usr/inc

Re: [PATCH 0/4] OpenMP 4.0 offloading to Intel MIC

On Thursday 2014-11-13 12:41, David Edelsohn wrote: > The patches have broken bootstrap on AIX and probably on other non-GNU > platforms. strchrnul() is a GNU extension. Yep, FreeBSD 8 is broken as well. The failure rate of my nightly testers over the last two weeks must be around 50%. Gerald

Re: GCC 5 fallout: libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc

On Saturday 2014-08-23 12:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues > due to the version number change. > > One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc > as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc. > >

Re: Localized write permission for OS maintainers

On Thursday 2014-12-18 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I have a question regarding the localized write permission for OS > maintainers. In > > https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/svnwrite.html > > we have > > "Localized write permission. > >This is for people who have primary responsibility f

Build failure with clang

In the last 36 hours or so someone has broken bootstrap with clang as the bootstrap compiler (this being FreeBSD 10.1): echo timestamp > s-gtype c++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format

Re: minor: 2014 instead of 2015 in the timeline

On Sunday 2015-01-25 20:04, Leonid Yuriev wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline > > s/GCC 5 Stage 4 (starts 2014-01-17)/GCC 5 Stage 4 (starts 2015-01-17)/ Thanks for reporting this, Leonid. I just applied the obvious patch below. Gerald Index: develop.html

Re: About the GCC mirror on igor.onlinedirect.bg

Hi Igor Team, On Wednesday 2014-11-19 19:52, i...@onlinedirect.bg wrote: > I write to inform you that unfortunately OnlineDirect (the sponsoring > company) was acquired and the Igor machine will be stopped in the > coming weeks. thank you for the heads up. I checked and even now, more than two

Re: Stepping down as global maintainer

On Friday 2015-02-06 16:42, Diego Novillo wrote: > As such, I propose to become a write-after-approval maintainer > and relinquish all the other maintainer roles I had. Thanks for your contributions over the years, Diego! I had a look at gcc/doc/contrib.texi and am not sure this properly reflects

Re: need help with Pointer Bounds Checking documentation

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> Patch is a part of a series which is waiting for additional steering >> committee approval due to copyright and a license. > I don't imagine the documentation for *features already committed* > needs to wait for steering committee approval; per the G

Sandra Loosemore appointed docs maintainer

For those of you following gcc-patches this may not be the most terrible surprise given what she has been contributing the last couple of months alone. That said I am happy to announce Sandra Loosemore as docs maintainer. Thanks for all the improvements you have contributed so far, Sandra, a

Re: Mirror

Hi William, On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, William Laeder wrote: > On the page: https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/mirrors.html > > The St. Louis Mirror is not configured properly, all it shows is a > welcome page from apache. The gcc's file system structure (assuming > its the same for all mirrors) does not

Re: gcc wiki project

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, David Kunsman wrote: > Hello, I was just reading through the current projects wiki page and I > noticed how out of date pretty much all of them are. So I was > planning on doing "spring cleaning" by going down the list tracking > down what has been and what needs to be down an

Re: gcc 4.8.2 online docs broken

Hi Ryan, On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Ryan Mansfield wrote: > A number of the links in 4.8.2 docs are broken (trunk seem to be OK). > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.8.2/gcc/ has 404s for the following: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options

[wwwdocs] PATCH for RE: wrong mirror on GCC mirror sites page

On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Matthew Fortune wrote: > Conrad S writes: How did this get into the mirror list? >>> >>> Because they said they would provide mirrors: >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-06/msg00251.html >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-07/msg00156.html >> >> Upon closer inspection

Re: Wierd manual link and resulting dead link

Hi James, On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, James Cloos wrote: > The What's New in 4.8 document links to the X86 Built-in Functions > section of the online manual, but its link is dead. > > The working link is: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built_002din-Functions.html#X86-Built_002din-Functi

Re: Probably inaccuracy in GCC 4.7.0 documentation.

Hi Roman, On Wed, 16 May 2012, Роман Саженков wrote: > It seems like I've found an inaccuracy in GCC 4.7.0 documentation. It is > about -fdefer-pop optimization option. The point is that this option is > mentioned in the list of optimization flags which -O1 turns on (Chapter > 3: GCC Command Op

Re: Updating the simtest-howto

On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Cynthia Rempel wrote: > I was looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/simtest-howto.html and was wondering > if the bottom of the page could be modified from links to tests ran in > 2003 to a link to testresults with a search for sim, like > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?wm=wr

GNAT User's Guide /onlinedocs broken? (was: Broken links on gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs)

On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote: > The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The > corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken: > GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/) > also in PDF (/onlinedocs

Re: Please document `contrib/download_prerequisites'

On Thu, 30 May 2013, Michael Witten wrote: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC > I'm not looking for anything. > > That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page > calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should > probably be thrown out as superfluous.

Re: [PATCH][www] Document versioning scheme for GCC 5 and up

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Richard Biener wrote: > The following aims to document the details of the versioning scheme we > intend to use for GCC 5 and up. > > Summary in non-html: Development of GCC 5 will happen as > GCC 5.0.0 (experimental), once we enter regression-fixing-only mode > (post-stage3)

Re: GCC 6.0 Status Report (2015-04-13)

Hi Jakub, On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Priority # Change from last report > --- --- > P14- 3 > P2 80+ 10 > P39+- 0 > P4 84+ 4 > P5 35- 1

Re: Connecting to gcc.gnu.org - keygen_fail

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Mikhail Maltsev wrote: > The server replies with status code "307 Temporary Redirect" and > redirects to HTTPS version ("Location: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/segfault.html";). Recent versions of Chrome and > Firefox (well, Iceweasel actually) handle it correctly. SSL certificat

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: [ANN] gcc-lua: Lua plugin for the GNU Compiler Collection

Hi Peter, On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Peter Colberg wrote: > gcc‑lua extends the GNU Compiler Collection with the ability to run Lua > scripts. The plugin provides an interface to register callback functions > for plugin events, and inspect the abstract syntax tree of a translation > unit. The plugin

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC Plugin Announcement; CTraps - Lightweight dynamic analysis for concurrent code

Hi Brandon, On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Brandon Lucia wrote: > I have implemented a GCC plugin that I have found useful for doing > dynamic program analysis, debugging, and performance tuning in > concurrent code. > > The plugin is called CTraps, short for Communication Traps. The main > idea behind CT

Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC Plugin Announcement; CTraps - Lightweight dynamic analysis for concurrent code

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> I added this to our extensions page at https://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html >> per the patch below. > Shouldn't we also list the GCC Python Plugin on that page? Yes, absolutely! David, want to suggest a patch? Or just some wording and a link and I'll t

[wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Confirmation Mirror Changes

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Tim Semeijn wrote: > We have changed our company name, hostnames and contact information. > Please remove the current BBLN mirror (mirror.bbln.org) and replace it > with our three new ones: The patch below implements those changes: - Replace mirror.bbln.org by mirror1.babylo

Re: wwwdocs/htdocs/onlinedocs/5.1.0 - New directory

Hi Jakub, would this better be gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/5.1/ instead of 5.1.0 to be in alignment with the release? Gerald PS. I can make this change on gcc.gnu.org (probably using a redirect for the original link).

Heads up: Our web pages are now HTML 5

As those of you watching gcc-patches@ will have noticed (or will notice beginning of your week), I was busy this weekend completing my project to convert the GCC web pages to HTML 5 (from previously XHTML). What does this mean for you? Really not a lot, practically, since most of the changes r

Re: Heads up: Our web pages are now HTML 5

On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > PS: There are a few older pages that I'm going to give a bit more > love and care the coming week or so, and our main page is the only > one left XHTML for the time being - WIP. To give you all an update, the number of pages still requiri

PATCH for Re: Broken mirror site

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, David McCallum wrote: > At this time, your Canadian mirror site at http://gcc.parentingamerica.com/ > is broken. There is only a page with the text "It works!"... which appears > to be untrue. Thanks for letting us know, David! James, heads up! For now I committed the patch b

Re: GCC 6.5 Status Report (2018-10-12)

Hi Jakub, On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If you have regression bugfixes or documentation fixes that should be > still backported to the branch, please test them and check them in > before Friday, October 19th I'd like to push back https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg000

Re: Old options in self tests?

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Anthony Green wrote: > I was building a C compiler from a source tree that does not include > the sources for the fortran front-end. It seems that this is no longer > supported, and the fortran sources must be available even if you're only > building C/C++. > > I'll stop st

Re: Building libssp on a system without gets()

On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, Florian Weimer wrote: >> some folks in FreeBSD-land have worked to remove all uses of gets() >> and in fact the gets() function itself. >> >> Generally GCC builds just fine in such an environment, except for >> libssp where libssp/gets-chk.c has the following: >> >>char * >

Renaming vec_step in tree-vect-loop.c (to fix build on powerpc/clang)

I have seen an increasing number of reports of GCC failing to build with clang on powerpc (on FreeBSD, though that's probably immaterial). Turns out that clang has vec_step as a reserved word on powerpc with AltiVec. We OTOH use vec_step s as a variable name in gcc/tree-vect-loop.c. The best ap

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >