Hi,
I'm working on some platform-specific optimizations for
memset/memcpy/strcpy/strncpy.
However, I am having difficulties understanding how my code should be
integrated.
Initially, I got inspired by rs6000-string.c, where I see expansion
code for instructions
like setmemsi or cmpstrsi. However,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:11 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>
> > * Why does the generic by-pieces infrastructure have a higher priority
> > than the target-specific expansion via INSNs like setmem?
>
> by-pieces was not affected by the recent change, and
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:59 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:19 PM Christoph Müllner via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:11 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> &g
Would it make sense to extend this proposal to include __strcmpeq()
and __strncmpeq()?
Both are already available internally in GCC in form of
BUILT_IN_STRCMP_EQ and BUILT_IN_STRNCMP_EQ
(tree-ssa-strlen.c detects them in handle_builtin_string_cmp() and
builtins.c tries to inline them in expand_bui
