read-priorities viable and safe.
Thanks in advance for any insight, and at the very least I hope that this
will serve as a warning to others who might find themselves in the same
situation.
Cheers,
Chad Attermann
"Ian Lance Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Chad Attermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello all. Late last year I posted a couple of questions about
multi-threaded application hangs in Solaris 10 for x86 platforms, and
about thread-safety of std::basic
"Ian Lance Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Chad Attermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I can not confirm that it was the i386 code included in the gcc build
but it appears that way from the signature. Is this perhaps a problem
with the way that gcc 3.
"Chad Attermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Running at least i486 code would make sense on AMD Opteron processors. I
am shocked that the gcc version shipped by Sun Microsystems would be
compiled for i386. I compiled my own version of gcc 4.2.2 n the same
platform and i
