[gomp] Broken gomp branch

ask the maintainers to fix that? Thanks, Biagio -- = Biagio Lucini Institut Fuer Theoretische Physik ETH Hoenggerberg CH-8093 Zuerich - Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)1 6332562 =

Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Biagio Lucini wrote: > > > The gomp branch fails to bootstrap for libtool problems in libgomp. > > Verified on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and on i686-unknown-linux-gnu. > > > > It

GCC 4.0 blacklisted for kde?

While discussing whether including gcc 4.0 in a Linux distro, someone pointed out this: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=111471706310369&w=2 I have checked the gcc bugzilla and either I am wrong or there is nothing relevant. Does anyone know some more? Thanks Biagio

Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes

On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21.16, Diego Novillo wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Lars Segerlund wrote: > > > we have to extend the gfortran internal representation also > > Yes, initially most of the effort will be in C/C++ since that's > the only parser we have so far. > Is ther

Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes

On Wednesday 04 May 2005 13.34, Paul Brook wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 May 2005 13:15, Biagio Lucini wrote > > > I have understood that at the moment some misbehaviour of the front-end > > prevents it, but I don't quite understand what the problem is. Can anyone > >

Benchmark of gcc 4.0

ks, Biagio -- ===== Biagio Lucini Institut Fuer Theoretische Physik ETH Hoenggerberg CH-8093 Zuerich - Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)1 6332562 =

Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0

CC 3.4). I will test on amd64, just to see whether there is any difference. Thanks, Biagio -- ===== Biagio Lucini Institut Fuer Theoretische Physik ETH Hoenggerberg CH-8093 Zuerich - Switzerland

Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0

n so, there is at least one place where - if I can say that - we have a regression. Ready to test again, Biagio -- ========= Biagio Lucini Institut Fuer Theoretische Physik ETH Hoenggerberg CH-8093 Zuerich - Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)1 6332562 =

Re: gomp slowness

skaller wrote: Hi, I have just run and timed a couple of tutorial examples for openMP using gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 (Ubuntu 4.2.1-5ubuntu4) on a dual core Athlon amd64, with OMP_NUM_THREADS set to 1 and 2, and occasionally 8 I found that 1 thread outperforms 2 by almost 2:1 on all the examples, and 8 i