> Hi Art,
Hi. Thanks for helping me try to fix the build problem I'm seeing.
{ ... snip ... }
> Could be, see above. Apart from that, I wonder why you insist on using
> GNU ld on Solaris. install.texi strongly suggests to use the Solaris
> linker instead, and I stand by that advise.
> A couple
> Hi Art,
Hello.
>> Could be, see above. Apart from that, I wonder why you insist on using
>> GNU ld on Solaris. install.texi strongly suggests to use the Solaris
>> linker instead, and I stand by that advise.
>
>> A couple of comments on those configure options: avoid everything not
>> strictl
>> Art Haas writes:
>> My bootstrap builds have been failing in the 'libgfortran' portion
>> of the build since this patch:
>>
>> 2009-07-27 Tobias Burnus
>>
>> PR fortran/40863
>> * c99_functions.c: Define complex I, if not defined.
>> Create prototypes for C99 fu
...
Thanks.
Art Haas
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Arthur Haas
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Hi Art,
> My builds on my X86 solaris box have failed since ye
also.
Thanks.
Art Haas
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Arthur Haas
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failures on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Hi Art,
> My builds on my X86 solaris box have failed
>Revital1 Eres writes:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> i386-pc-solaris:
>>>
>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>>> /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c: In
function
>>> 'loop_prefetch_arrays':
>>> /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc.git/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c:1589:7:
error:
>>>
>>> forma
Hi.
The patch resolves the build failures.
Thanks.
Art Haas
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Froyd [mailto:froy...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 12:29 PM
To: Ian Lance Taylor
Cc: Arthur Haas; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failed for i386-pc-solaris2.10 and sparc
> Hi Art,
>> No luck with this mornings builds on both x86 and sparc.
>>
>> My last successful i386-pc-solaris2.10 build was several weeks ago; all
> the build attempts fail at this assertion in the function/file below:
>> { ... snip ... }
> I'm building mainline on Solaris 8 to 11 with both Sun
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Art Haas wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> The bootstrap problems I've been having on the x86 Solaris machine,
>> plus the reply from maintainer Rainer Orth that his builds have
>> been succeeding were the impetus to investigate how 'git bisect'
>> works. After a bit of fumb
Hi.
Even with the patch listed in the bug report below my bootstrap would
still fail when the compiler tries to build libgcc.
The bug report for the bootstrap failure is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37424
The build failed while building libgcc - the code would trip up on an
> -Original Message-
> [ ... snip ... ]
>
> > CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS_S = $(CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS) -fPIC
> >
> > How do you use +=?
>
> Sorry, I was looking at an old checkout.
>
> Could you simply test patching config/i386/t-crtstuff like this:
>
> -CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS = -fno-omit-frame-pointer
11 matches
Mail list logo
