Cygwin support

2008-11-14 Thread Andy Scott
Hi All Looking over the bugzilla data base and archives of this (and other) lists I was wondering about the level of support there is for GCC on Cygwin. (I realise that it is weird half-way house to many people and so does get a fair amount of "abuse" from both the Windoze & Linux/Un*x purist camp

Re: Cygwin support

2008-11-14 Thread Andy Scott
On 14/11/2008, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andy Scott wrote: > > > Looking over the bugzilla data base and archives of this (and other) > > lists I was wondering about the level of support there is for GCC on > > Cygwin. (I realise that it is weird

This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Scott
Got to building the latest stuff on Cygwin - I modiifed the autoconfig script to get around some issues relating to 'ln -s' - and I then started the build. Got some errors, one I think is a Cygwin issue (but wanting that final 1% assurance) other I am pretty sure is a build/setup issue: source:

Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-08 Thread Andy Scott
On 07/01/2009, Dave Korn wrote: > Andy Scott wrote: > > GCC Build One: > > > > Again stage3 part of build, and this is what actually stops the build > > the above issue doesn't seem to (I think it happens in stage 2), > > > That sentence contradicts

Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-14 Thread Andy Scott
On 10/01/2009, Bernd Roesch wrote: > Hello Dave > >> Unix commad for stack increase(forget the name) > > > > 'ulimit' > > > ah yes i see, I update from time and time and now its more.my bash show this > now.Maybe Andy can do this test what his bash show. > > $ ulimit -a > core file size

Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-21 Thread Andy Scott
2009/1/18 Dave Korn : > Andy Scott wrote: > >> Again stage3 part of build, and this is what actually stops the build >> the above issue doesn't seem to (I think it happens in stage 2), I get >> the following: >> >> > > < a few more lin

Re: This is a Cygwin failure yeah?

2009-01-26 Thread Andy Scott
On 18/01/2009, Dave Korn wrote: > Andy Scott wrote: > > > Again stage3 part of build, and this is what actually stops the build > > the above issue doesn't seem to (I think it happens in stage 2), I get > > the following: > > > >