On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:58:40 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> > I'd have thought that a function-wide
> > __attribute__((__string_section__(foo))
> > wouldn't be a ton of work to implement.
>
> Maybe not.
>
> Could some future version of gcc move string constants
> in a function to a specific sec
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:29:29 -0800 Justin Mattock
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not sure how to handle this,
> while compiling firefox-3.6b1.source
> I get this with the default compiling options,
> as well as custom:
>
> ...
>
> active_anon:2360492kB inactive_anon:590196kB active_file:84kB
2.8GB of an
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:32:16 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
> > It would help if the oom-killer were to print some information about
> > the oom-killed process's memory footprint.
> >
>
>
> How about this?
looks good, thanks.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] oom: show vsz and rss informati
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:16:41 +0800 Baoquan He wrote:
> with GCC 13.2.1 and W=1, there's compiling warning like this:
>
> kernel/panic.c: In function ‘__warn’:
> kernel/panic.c:676:17: warning: function ‘__warn’ might be a candidate for
> ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format
