bootstrap on powerpc fails

m_locations, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:16955 Is this already known or should I file a bugreport? I haven't tested for over a week, so do not know when this was introduced... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr

Re: Building mainline and 4.2 on Debian/amd64

e might do the trick, >>> but I don't know what arguments are accepted. >> >> Would --disable-multilib work? > > I'll try, but I doubt it. According to the installation > documentation, amd64 is not a multilib target. It is - if the documentation is not corre

Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074

contents of this bug box in the report. | | Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered. | | Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format | | (concatenated together with no headers between files). | +

Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. make[2]: *** [i386.o] Error 1 pgpB32lG0dell.pgp Description: PGP signature Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:07:23AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> Current GCC CVS Mainline fails to bootstrap for me: >> > Odd, my x86_64 works just fine. Send me a .i file? Just for the record: I did this yesterday off-l

Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:58:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> I can still reproduce the problem and played around a bit. If I >> disable checking completely, I can bootstrap. So, perhaps I have one >> more checkin

Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> I configure with: >> >> /cvs/gcc/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/4.1-devel >> --enable-checking=misc,tree,gc,rtl,rtlflag,assert --enable-threads=pos

Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada?

in _start () at start.S:113 This is with current GCC mainline and happens on both Linux/x86-64 and Linux/PowerPC for me. Anybody with the same problem? I'll do a binary search now to figure out which patch broke this, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~

Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada?

e have some kind of miscompilation. Can you try bootstrapping with Ada included on x86-64 or ppc and does this work for you? Andreas Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yesterday I tried building gcc again for the first time since two > weeks and encountered what looks like an

Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada?

Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/13/05, Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anybody with the same problem? > > maybe, maybe not, I'm in an endless loop at Yes, that's the same problem, if I do a parallel build, it hanges there

Bootstrap failure in libobjc

source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. make[2]: *** [Object.lo] Error 1 Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 5

Re: Bootstrap failure in libobjc

hable ' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpwvFPrjT9Ut.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [rfc] mainline slush

ss errors: /cvs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr18400.c:9: internal compiler error: tree ch eck: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:750 WARNING: gcc.dg/vect/pr18400.c compilation failed to produce executable Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.

Re: tree ssa and type issues

d be changed on the 4.0 branch as well, Seems your C++ project is indeed usefull ;-) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgp9Gv6U7xhUr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: tree ssa and type issues

Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | > Hi again, > | > > | > I just hit this one from tree-ssa-into.c:rewrite_

Re: [rfc] mainline slush

few things get modified: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00900.html Unfortunately he did not seem to have sent a followup. Could you polish up his patch and get it committed? Or who will? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH,

Re: Ada Status in mainline

cc/gcc/ada/atree.adb:51: error: invariant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed &C.3357D.19259; pgp6lIoaXOKcV.pgp Description: PGP signature Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG finge

Re: Howto biarch compiler default to -m32?

ux64.h > in the arch config dir? For PowerPC I just add: --with-cpu=default32 But I do not know whether this is generic, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B8

Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias...

). | +==+ Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C

Re: Big Classpath Merge warning

ather unfortunate, it makes it difficult to grep for errors. Can't we use something like? @test -z gnu/java/rmi || mkdir gnu/java/rmi Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint =

Re: Big Classpath Merge warning

Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I know have a problem building gcc mainline with a parallel build on >> Linux/x86-64: >> >> /usr/include/java/net/URL.h:25: error: global qualification of clas

Re: Big Classpath Merge warning

Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andreas> So, which rule is responsible for creating the header files? And why > Andreas> is there no dependency of gij.lo on it? >

Re: Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)

Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have to manually kill at least c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and > c94002g... (and more?) Ada is quite broken right now - see also: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROT

Re: Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)

was doing a long cvs operation locking any other use, so > I had to leave before being able to commit the change. Do you have a patch that you could send already for others to use? > I should be able to get to it on monday, assuming cvs is available then. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EM

Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Many thanks to people enabling Ada in their builds! I'd like to enable it for 4.1 CVS but that one is failing since last week as reported in bugzilla :-( Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE

Re: libjawtgnu linking borked

ot added to the Link line. So, the problem should be reproducable in the following cases: Using DESTDIR and having no libgtkpeer installed in a standard path. Tom, this still appears with todays sources and worked before the classpath import, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpj6dGnNVGup.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: svn troubles

onnection timed out I didn't read that it's up again after the switch from CVS to SVN - I suggest to wait until Danny sends the announcement, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fi

.cvsignore still needed?

/compat/.cvsignore ./libjava/classpath/include/.cvsignore ./libjava/classpath/examples/.cvsignore ./libjava/classpath/.cvsignore ./libjava/include/.cvsignore ./libjava/.cvsignore ./libcpp/.cvsignore ./fixincludes/.cvsignore ./.cvsignore Shouldn't we delete all of them? Andreas -- Andreas J

Re: .cvsignore still needed?

"svn rm" or do you want to do some other magic? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpds01coEa1d.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: .cvsignore still needed?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:47:59AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 15:19 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > [...] > > >> ./.cvsignore > > >> > > >> Shouldn

fixincludes make check broken?

: *** [check] Error 1 Any ideas? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpNw9bkbTl8d.pgp Description: PGP signature

java broken on Linux/x86-64

<> Caused by: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException <> FAIL: longfield run This is on Linux/x86-64, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F

Lots of new failures in objc testsuite

g-struct-layout-encoding-1/t001_main.m (test for excess errors) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpgC57CxsAbG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada

. I'm trying to hunt down the change now, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpogpU0hSmxd.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada

# until gnatlib is built as a shared library on AIX. Compiling the # compiler with -mminimal-toc does not cause any harm. -ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET = -mminimal-toc +ADAFLAGS_FOR_TARGET += -mminimal-toc -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxf

bootstrap broken

: Change the type of x_basic_block_info to VEC(basic_block,gc) *. (BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FUNCTION, BASIC_BLOCK): Adjust the uses of basic_block_info. (SET_BASIC_BLOCK): New. Could you fix this, please? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj

Re: The testsuite is way broken right now

/test_summary was not updated. I'm in the middle of a test run and will check myself as well, Andreas > > > Can someone figure out what is going on? > > I am running a bootstrap/test right now on powerpc-darwin to see if I > can > reproduce it. > > -- Pinski > Andr

Re: RFC: Improving support for known testsuite failures

generated .sum files. The filter could live in > /contrib and be used on demand. > > I am not thrilled about the prospect of implementing this in > DejaGNU directly. > > Thoughts? good idea. I have my own homegrown script that builds gcc and outputs something like: trunk: succe

Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017)

The tree is still broken for me. Daniel, did you commit your patch? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017)

. The issue is *not* fixed according to Daniel, there's still another problem. Could you look into it, please? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B88

Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

and growing. Seems that we have either a miscompilation of the stage2 compiler and/or some memory leak, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

I'm still seeing this with current Subversion. Anybody else having the same problem on x86-64? It fails for me on the two systems I tested it on, Andreas Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Linux/x86-64 bootstrapping a biarch compiler fails with: > > cc1: out

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:42:24PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > >I'm still seeing this with current Subversion. Anybody else having > >the same problem on x86-64? It fails for me on the two syst

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:42:24PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > >I'm still seeing this with current Subversion. Anybody else having > >the same problem on x86-64? It fails for me on the two syst

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 21, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 12:42:24PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >>> >>>> >>

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

I'll look further into this myself now, thanks for trying to reproduce this, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272

Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64

particular config. Ok, figured it out, it's my ulimit call: ulimit -m 60 -v 60 So, memory usage has increased during the last days. Don't we have some automatic testers that look at memory usage as well? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.d

Re: Patch policy for branches

time of less than two month where a user first updates to 4.0.3 and then to 4.1.0. I doubt that users update in that way so often that we have to take care of that. On the other hand, I know of users that have several branches installed to test both old and new compilers and those might ge

Re: Is it x86-64 or x86_64 ?

4" but uname/configure use "x86_64", Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpTFz6OT0rhZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Status of SEE and Autovectorization patches?

reads=posix --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,ada,treelang,java,fortran,objc --with-system-zlib x86_64-suse-linux-gnu This really has to be fixed, IMHO the optimization does not seem to be ready for stage 3, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EM

ada bootstrap broken on powerpc64-linux-gnu

This is with yesterday's GCC, I'll try current one now. Any ideas? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgp1EGTt1Ap6t.pgp Description: PGP signature

make proto fails

or argument ‘clean_text_p’ might be clobbered by ‘longjmp’ or ‘vfork’ unprotoize.o-warn = -Wno-error If I should submit this as patch, please tell me, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 pgpk5Vo0QBTvD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: make proto fails

Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> make proto on gcc trunk fails on Linux/x86_64 with: > > Do you actually need protoize and unprotoize? I think it would be > nice to deprecate them. Prototypes have

Re: make proto fails

Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> /cvs/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/protoize.c: In function ‘edit_fn_definition’: >> /cvs/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/protoize.c:3506: warning: argument ‘clean_text_p’ >> might be clobbere

bootstrap of trunk fails for x86-64

u', have 's' (rtx match_code) in write_match_code_switch, at genpreds.c:546 make[3]: *** [s-preds] Error 1 Roger, is this is a result of your changes? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germa

Trunk bootstrap failure on Linux/x86_64 in reload1.c

e-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --with-system-zlib x86_64-suse-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,treelang Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 36

Re: Trunk bootstrap failure on Linux/x86_64 in reload1.c

Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:25:09PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> > > >> > > On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> > > > Trunk fails to build for me with: >> > &

Re: Trunk bootstrap failure on Linux/x86_64 in reload1.c

Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:25:09PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:5

Re: mismatched parentheses in reload1.c

REGNO (rld[r].in) >>&& ! reg_set_p (rld[r].reg_rtx, PATTERN (insn))) >> > Sadly there is yet another typo in this particular change (I didn't > noticed even after proofreading the patch again after Paolo's original > mail). It is causing the enab

Re: libstdc++, -m64 and can't find atom for N_GSYM stabs

gt; For i386 vs x86_64 I'm getting a different set of pass/fail between > the two. I do, however, have those 4 failures on x86_64 and not on > i386. Those come AFAIR from a wrong locale path. I'm not sure whether a bug is filed for this or whether it was only discussed at

Re: Mainline java is broken

ld/gcc-test/gcc/libjava/java/util/logging/Logger.java:510: >> multiple definition of `java::util::logging::Logger::getName()' > > I think this is a libtool bug (or relate to libtool). This is a breakage of "[PATCH] Don't use weak linkage for symbols in COMDAT groups" Andr

Re: What kernel, glibc version and/or configure flags for clean testsuite results on i686/x86_64?

/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01577.html > > These results are don't have them: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01569.html This is my openSUSE 10.3 system with kernel 2.6.22 and glibc 2.6.1. configure options are shown at the end of the report. Andreas -- Andreas

Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

it's just a matter of time. Typical distro cycles are on > the order of 3 years. But distros release fixes regularly for their kernels - and adding a fix for this issue with their next security update is something that is possible for distros (at least for openSUSE ;-), Andreas -- Andre

Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o

ptimized case) and therefore building of e.g. cc1-dummy fails. Adding -Wl,--relax to the cc1-dummy build helped for that binary but I found no way to get this properly into the Makefiles (and make LDFLAGS="-Wl,--relax" gave an error in configure later on), Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger,

Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 03:08:43PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>>>> Andreas Jaeger writes: > > > > Andreas> I had the same problem on my PowerPC Linux machine and the > > workaround > &g

Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o

David Edelsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> Andreas Jaeger writes: > > Andreas> I'm not a build machinery expert - if anybody has a patch, I'll > happily test it, > Andreas> I'm building on Linux/Powerpc64. > > Andreas&g

Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Selon Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> This gets me a bit further but I do get later a build failure in >> configure: >> >> checking for powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu-strip... strip >> checking whether ln -s works... yes &g

Re: Linking very large application with GCC trunk on powerpc-linux leads to relocation error of crtbegin/end.o

t --relax is not the right solution for the problem. I'll continue with the STAGE1_CFLAG flag but if anybody else wants me to test something, please tell me, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG

Bootstrap failure with --enable-checking=all,rtl

`/abuild-old/aj/gcc/gcc' make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2 this seems to have been introduced by: 2007-08-22 Chao-ying Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] * cse.c (hash_rtx): Support CONST_FIXED. Chao-ying, could you fix this, please? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Direct

Bootstrap broken - treelang: error: ‘treelang_expand_function’ defined but not used

: ‘treelang_expand_function’ defined but not used make[3]: *** [treelang/treetree.o] Error 1 Any ideas? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3