On 23/02/11 05:25, David C. Rankin wrote:
(1) if this is the right place for the glibc issue; and
No. This list is for the development of gcc.
(2) if you think it is something that should be filed or whether the error
points to a packaging problem or a problem with the Trinity source.
Give
On 02/06/11 23:51, bd satish wrote:
Hi,
All these days there used to be different tarballs like
gcc-core-*.tar.bz2, gcc-fortran-*.tar.bz2, etc. in the snapshot
directory ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/LATEST-4.7. But now I
see only one combined tarball (starting with 4.7-20110528). I liked
On 03/06/11 15:39, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/06/11 23:51, bd satish wrote:
Hi,
All these days there used to be different tarballs like
gcc-core-*.tar.bz2, gcc-fortran-*.tar.bz2, etc. in the snapshot
directory ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/LATEST-4.7. But now I
see only one combined
On 08/07/11 18:06, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Hello All,
It is my pleasure to announce the 2nd release candidate of MELT plugin
version 0.8 for GCC 4.6
You can download it from http://gcc-melt.org/
gnuzipped tar http://gcc-melt.org/melt-0.8rc2-plugin-for-gcc-4.6.tgz
of md5sum 880db34a1d76a27f
On 08/07/11 19:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:41:30PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
empty-file-for-melt.c
cc1: note: MELT is bootstrapping so ignore builtin source directory
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.1/plugin/melt-source and module
directory
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc
On 09/07/11 01:43, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:50:11 +1000
Allan McRae wrote:
On 08/07/11 19:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:41:30PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
empty-file-for-melt.c
cc1: note: MELT is bootstrapping so ignore builtin source
On 11/07/11 03:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:00:14 +0200
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
For your information, I corrected that bug (not only made the
workaround) on MELT svn rev. 176125.
So I think that the MELT plugin 0.8 final
(which I will probably release in a couple
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
At least on Cygwin (1.7), the current GCC snapshot (20090917) fails to
build:
[...]
/tmp/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/gfortran/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/
-B/usr/local/gfortran/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/gfortran/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isyste
On 03/04/10 03:28, Roman Kononov wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:55:47 -0400 Jack Howarth
wrote:
I've not seen any discussion of testing gcc trunk
against the newer gmp 5.0 or 5.0.1 releases. Has anyone
done significant testing with the newer gmp releases
... ?
I use gcc 4.4.4 an
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
1. Consider MPC as an optional library now, install all the code and make
it hard-required only when all the complex math functions are made
available in a future released version of the lib
10 matches
Mail list logo
