Hi all,
Since BZ#67877 [1] does not have much information on it, I would like
to ask for some inputs of which is the requirement of implementing
split-stack on aarch64 besides 'feature parity'.
I am asking it because on PR it states the main use it gccgo and
afaik there is some usage in other pro
On 25/11/2019 17:28, Andrew Dean via gcc wrote:
>>> This completes successfully. However, when I then try to run the gcc tests
>>> like
>> so:
>>> runtest --outdir . --tool gcc --srcdir /path/to/gcc/gcc/testsuite
>>> aarch64.exp --target aarch64-linux-gnu --target_board aarch64-sim
>>> --tool_e
Hi all, I would like to check if someone could help me figure out
an issue I am chasing on a libgomp patch intended to partially
address the issue described at BZ#79784.
I have identified that one of the bottlenecks is the global barrier
used on both thread pool and team which causes a lof of ca
On 30/04/2020 18:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:37:26PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella via Gcc wrote:
>> Hi all, I would like to check if someone could help me figure out
>> an issue I am chasing on a libgomp patch intended to partially
>> address the
On 24/11/2020 10:59, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 11/24/20 7:11 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> ideally fpclassify (and other classification macros) would
>> handle all representations.
>>
>> architecturally invalid or trap representations can be a
>> non-standard class but i think classifying the
> Il giorno 11 apr 2021, alle ore 17:45, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc
> ha scritto:
>
> Remember how much hate RMS got in glibc land for something I did? I
> said I did it out of my own volition, I explained my why I did it, but
> people wouldn't believe he had nothing to do with it!
It was cle
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 8:06 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
> > It was clear to me and others glibc maintainers that it was *you* who
> > bypass the consensus to *not* reinstate the “joke”.
>
> I think you wrote it backward
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:43 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
> > All the other active maintainers suggested you shouldn't have done that,
> > but you
> > ignored it anyway.
>
> How could I possibly have igno
On 12/04/2021 14:52, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>> No, you are insinuating that the glibc community both as maintainer
>> and contributors acted in a hateful way regarding the 'joke'
>> removal. Sorry, but this
On 15/01/24 09:46, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 01/13/2024 13:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> This commit
>>
>> commit 8abddb187b33480d8827f44ec655f45734a1749d
>> Author: Andrew Burgess
>> Date: Sat Aug 5 14:31:06 2023 +0200
>>
>> libgcc: support heap-based trampolines
>>
>> Add suppo
10 matches
Mail list logo
