[no subject]

2025-02-12 Thread Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, 00:24 Frederick Virchanza Gotham wrote: >> As the GNU compiler make its way through a translation unit, more and >> more classes get declared. So for each translation unit, the compiler >> maintains a list of what types it has seen so far. >> >> Could

Re:

2025-02-12 Thread Tobias Hunger via Gcc
Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc : > This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might > become deprecated in the future). Huch? Where did you catch that? Did I miss something? Best Regards, Tobias

22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int

2025-02-12 Thread Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
Embench is used for benchmarking on embedded devices. This one project matmult-int has a function Multiply. It’s a matrix multiplication for 20 x 20 matrix. The device is a ATSAME70Q21B which is Cortex-M7 The compiler is arm branch based on GCC version 13 We are compiling with O3 which has loop-i

Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int

2025-02-12 Thread Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc
* When we do the loop interchange on the one loop nest that get interchanged in the program source it is slightly (.7%) faster. From: Gcc on behalf of Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 at 10:38 AM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmu

Re: 22% degradation seen in embench:matmult-int

2025-02-12 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:38 PM Visda.Vokhshoori--- via Gcc wrote: > > Embench is used for benchmarking on embedded devices. > This one project matmult-int has a function Multiply. It’s a matrix > multiplication for 20 x 20 matrix. > The device is a ATSAME70Q21B which is Cortex-M7 > The compiler

Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc
Tobias wrote: >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might >> become deprecated in the future). >Huch? Where did you catch that? Did I miss something? I think it might be a possibility given how

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:46:23PM +, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc wrote: > Tobias wrote: > > >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: > >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might > >> become deprecated in the future). > > >H

Re: Classes Implicitly Declared

2025-02-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 22:47, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc wrote: > > Tobias wrote: > > >>Am Mi., 12. Feb. 2025 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Frederick Virchanza Gotham: > >> This would be an alternative to modules (seeing as how modules might > >> become deprecated in the future). > > >Huch? Where d