Thomas Koenig via Gcc writes:
> Hello world,
>
> looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where
> it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming
> or not. I would propose to add a keyword for that, tentatively
> called "interp".
>
> Comments? Suggestions for
Am 10.02.25 um 23:44 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
Indeed 'need-language-lawyering' (or similar) would've been my suggestion
for the new keyword, but I resisted the color-of-bike-shed opportunity.
My fear would be that people would misspell laywer :-)
I've added needs-stdcheck and will go through a
On 2/9/25 11:34, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
Compare a standard gcc build:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html
with this one using checking=all:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-Febru
