* Alexander Monakov:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>
>> I would like to provide a facility to create wrapper functions without
>> lots of argument shuffling. To achieve that, the wrapping function and
>> the wrapped function should have the same prototype. There will be a
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> * Alexander Monakov:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to provide a facility to create wrapper functions without
> >> lots of argument shuffling. To achieve that, the wrapping function and
> >> th
* Alexander Monakov:
>> > Not in a way that will work with LLVM, I'm afraid, and with GCC
>> > you'll have to shield wrappers from LTO:
>> >
>> > register void *r10 asm("r10");
>> > void f(int, int);
>> > void f_wrap(int a, int b)
>> > {
>> > r10 = f;
>> > f(a, b);
>> > }
>>
>> Does this
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> * Alexander Monakov:
> >> Does this work on all primary GCC targets?
> >
> > Yes? I'm not sure why you think it might not work. What are your
> > concerns?
>
> Targets not setting up REGISTER_NAMES, not mentioning the static chain
> pointer r
