i prefer using the gas syntax than using the nasm but i don't know it looks
like it generates pretty large binaries, so i wanna know if there is any
flags that i am missing or this is the way that it works? i compiled this
`movb $0, al` and it's about 720 byte and i wan't to use it instead of nasm
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 20:07, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:57 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:38 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > > > Am 27.06.2024 um 19:04 schrieb Jason Merrill via Gcc :
> > > >
> > > > https://www.open-std.o
On Tuesday, 25 June 2024 21:44:15 CDT Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> I am in the middle of improving the isolation path pass for shifts
> with out of range operands.
> There are 3 options we could do really:
> 1) isolate the path to __builtin_unreachable
> 2) isolate the path to __builtin_trap
>
Am Samstag, dem 29.06.2024 um 08:50 -0500 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc:
...
> I.e. once UB becomes IFNDR, the dreaded time-travel optimizations can't
> happen
> anymore. Instead precondition checks bubble up because otherwise the program
> is ill-formed.
It is not clear to mean what you mea
The d
Uh Dein moon
Sent from my iPhone guy Dr treetops set duty yfyfufyfyf chi by C byR Bob
Sent from my iPhone
Snapshot gcc-14-20240629 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20240629/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Saturday, 29 June 2024 16:20:55 GMT+2 Martin Uecker wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 29.06.2024 um 08:50 -0500 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc:
> > I.e. once UB becomes IFNDR, the dreaded time-travel optimizations can't
> > happen anymore. Instead precondition checks bubble up because otherwise
> > the p
Am Sonntag, dem 30.06.2024 um 05:03 +0200 schrieb Matthias Kretz:
> On Saturday, 29 June 2024 16:20:55 GMT+2 Martin Uecker wrote:
> > Am Samstag, dem 29.06.2024 um 08:50 -0500 schrieb Matthias Kretz via Gcc:
> > > I.e. once UB becomes IFNDR, the dreaded time-travel optimizations can't
> > > happen
Actually, it is very much aligned with what I want in C.
In general I want to have pragma-based compilation modes
for memory safety:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3211.pdf
(Bjarne Stroustrup has a proposal for profiles in C++ which
goes in similar direction I think)
>From a
