Re: Building Single Tree for a Specific Set of CFLAGS

Hi! On 3/26/24 22:52, Joel Sherrill via Gcc wrote: Hi For RTEMS, we normally build a multilib'ed gcc+newlib, but I have a case where the CPU model is something not covered by our multilibs and not one we are keen to add. I've looked around but not found anything that makes me feel confident. W

Re: Building Single Tree for a Specific Set of CFLAGS

Christophe Lyon via Gcc kirjoitti 27.3.2024 klo 10.52: On 3/26/24 22:52, Joel Sherrill via Gcc wrote: I am trying --disable-multlibs on the gcc configure and adding CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET to make. I would configure GCC with --disable-multilibs --with-cpu=XXX --with-mode=XXX --with-float=XXX [maybe

Re: [RFC] add regenerate Makefile target

On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 16:42, Jens Remus wrote: > > Am 15.03.2024 um 09:50 schrieb Christophe Lyon: > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 19:10, Simon Marchi wrote: > >> On 2024-03-13 04:02, Christophe Lyon via Gdb wrote: > ... > >> There's just the issue of files that are generated using tools that are > >

Re: [RFC] add regenerate Makefile target

Hi! On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 15:19, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 15:32, Christophe Lyon > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 16:34, Simon Marchi wrote: > > > > > > On 3/18/24 13:25, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > Well the rule to regenerate Makefile.in (eg in in opcodes/)

Re: Building Single Tree for a Specific Set of CFLAGS

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 3:53 AM Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > Hi! > > On 3/26/24 22:52, Joel Sherrill via Gcc wrote: > > Hi > > > > For RTEMS, we normally build a multilib'ed gcc+newlib, but I have a case > > where the CPU model is something not covered by our multilibs and not one > > we are

GSoC 2024 [Fortran - DO CONCURRENT] Seeking feedback/suggestions for project proposal

Hi, I'm Anuj M, an undergraduate student interested in participating in GSoC 2024 with GCC. I would like to work on the project improving the DO CONCURRENT construct in the GFortran compiler.The current implementation in GFortran has limitations in handling locality clauses, supporting reduction op

Re: AutoFDO tools for GCC

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:41 PM Andi Kleen via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 08:45:22AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 9:54 PM Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've been the AutoFDO maintainer for the last 1.5 years. I've resurr

Initial draft of GSOC proposal - Offloading to a separate process on the same host.

Hello! Thanks for your response Martin! Sorry for the late response, I've been researching the project, going over the source code and preparing the proposal. After a lot of thought, I've decided to go with the "Offloading to a separate process on the same host" project, mostly because I feel like