Hi,
The 01/08/2024 22:46, 钟居哲 wrote:
> Oh. It's nice to see you have support min/max index reduction.
>
> I knew your patch can handle this following:
>
>
> int idx = ii;
> int max = mm;
> for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
> int x = a[i];
> if (max < x) {
> max = x;
> idx = i;
> }
> }
I see. Thanks Tamar.
I am willing to to investigate Arm's initial patch to see what else we need in
that patch.
Since min/max reduction with index can improve SPEC performance, I will take a
look at it in GCC-15.
Thanks a lot !
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Tamar Christina
Date: 2024-01-09 1
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:57 PM 钟居哲 wrote:
>
> Hi, Richard.
>
> I saw this following code:
>
> if (LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_VCOND_MASK_LEN, vectype,
> OPTIMI
On 07/01/2024 19:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:16:41 +0800 Baoquan He wrote:
with GCC 13.2.1 and W=1, there's compiling warning like this:
kernel/panic.c: In function ?__warn?:
kernel/panic.c:676:17: warning: function ?__warn? might be a candidate for
?gnu_printf? format at
Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:07:06 +0100
Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
From: Björn Schäpers
That was about GetModuleHandle, not about GetModuleHandleEx. For the
latter, all Windows versions that support it also support
