Hi!
CCing Segher and David on this.
rs6000 indeed doesn't implement {,u}{add,sub,mul}v4_optab for
any mode and thus leaves it to the generic code.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:48:42AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> I'm looking at the generated code for these builtins on POWER:
>
> add 4,3,4
> rs6000 indeed doesn't implement {,u}{add,sub,mul}v4_optab for
> any mode and thus leaves it to the generic code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2016-October/460209.html
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi!
I was wondering if we can have a warning similar to
-Wmissing-field-initializers but for arrays.
Here's some example of what kind of code would benefit from this warning:
// foo.c
char *foo[5] = {
"foo",
"bar",
"baz"
// oops, accidentally the size doesn't match the actual n
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 20:46, David Shane Holden via Gcc
wrote:
>
> I requested a bugzilla account a few days ago and haven't heard
> back so I'm just going to report this here.
I've created your account now, so please post this to bugzilla, thanks!
On 1/25/23 13:06, Ben Boeckel wrote:
This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
Thanks again.
Support is communicated through the following three new fla
>From previous times we have FTensor
https://gcc.gnu.org/testing/testing-ftensor.html
documented as one of the ways to test GCC.
Alas http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor has been down for a while,
and there does not appear to be a new location?
Is anyone actually still using FTensor to te
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:20 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Alas http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor has been down for a while,
> and there does not appear to be a new location?
https://wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor/ works
