Hey everybody,
Apologies for this request, and perhaps the wrong mailing list.
I hope this gets the right level of attention.
It seems like the GCC frontend/WAF have blacklisted the entire subnet
used by Google Cloud for Internet access.
Follows some traces.
Could you please unblock us? It's re
Thanks!
$ curl -L -v -o /dev/null gcc.gnu.org
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:--
--:--:-- 0* Trying 8.43.
Federico Iezzi via Gcc writes:
> [...]
> It seems like the GCC frontend/WAF have blacklisted the entire subnet
> used by Google Cloud for Internet access.
> [...]
> $ curl ifconfig.me
> 35.234.162.99
This has been unblocked. We sometimes must block large subnets when
abusive traffic comes from
Building on Mac with Clang I get warnings like this:
../../../gcc/gcc/cgraph.h:2629:28: warning: struct 'cgraph_edge' was previously
declared as a class; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the
Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
It seems to be talking about a MS bug (since C
> On Jan 9, 2023, at 11:27 AM, Stefan Kanthak wrote:
>
> "Paul Koning" wrote:
>
>>> ...
>
>> Yes, I was thinking the same. But I spent a while on that pattern -- I
>> wanted to support div/mod as a single operation because the machine has
>> that primitive. And I'm pretty sure I saw it wo
Hello,
another year has passed and Google has announced there will be again
Google Summer of Code (GsoC) in 2023 and the deadline for organizations
to apply is already approaching (February 7th). I'd like to volunteer
to be the main Org Admin for GCC again so let me know if you think I
shouldn't
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:51 AM Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
> Building on Mac with Clang I get warnings like this:
>
> ../../../gcc/gcc/cgraph.h:2629:28: warning: struct 'cgraph_edge' was
> previously declared as a class; this is valid, but may result in linker
> errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI
In pdp11.md I have:
(define_insn_and_split "addhi3"
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rR,rR,Q,Q")
(plus:HI (match_operand:HI 1 "general_operand" "%0,0,0,0")
(match_operand:HI 2 "general_operand" "rRLM,Qi,rRLM,Qi")))]
""
"#"
"reload_completed"
[(p
NightStrike wrote:
[...]
I did another little test to try to better understand your point. I
ran a linux native testsuite under a simulator that just sets SIM to "
". This resulted in extra ^M's also, although many tests pass because
they're already looking for \r\n to accommodate windows. So
