Support & activation is inbuilt-UJTV-796682313354 of items

2022-12-21 Thread order detailsUJTV8911 via Gcc
Dear gcc, We're prepared to ship your purchase to you. Updated with receipt. Much Appreciated. Invoice82313354.pdf Description: Binary data

-minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Hi, I've long had this wish: an option similar to -std, but which would not specify the standard. Rather, mark a requirement that the standard be at least a version. This would be especially useful for libraries, which might for example require C99 or C11 to work. They would be able to spec

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alexander Monakov via Gcc
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > I've long had this wish: an option similar to -std, but which would not > specify the standard. Rather, mark a requirement that the standard be at > least a version. > > This would be especially useful for libraries, which might

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Hi Alexander, On 12/21/22 19:51, Alexander Monakov wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: Hi, I've long had this wish: an option similar to -std, but which would not specify the standard. Rather, mark a requirement that the standard be at least a version. This would

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
On 12/21/22 19:53, Alejandro Colomar wrote: Hi Alexander, On 12/21/22 19:51, Alexander Monakov wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: Hi, I've long had this wish: an option similar to -std, but which would not specify the standard.  Rather, mark a requirement that t

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alexander Monakov via Gcc
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > > There's already a standard, portable way to check: > > > > #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 201710 > > #error C17 required > > #endif > > Hmm, not my favourite to stick that in every public header file, but yes, it's > portable. I don't see why

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, 19:08 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc, wrote: > > > On 12/21/22 19:53, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > > > On 12/21/22 19:51, Alexander Monakov wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I've long had this w

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Hi Alexander, On 12/21/22 20:12, Alexander Monakov wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: There's already a standard, portable way to check: #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 201710 #error C17 required #endif Hmm, not my favourite to stick that in every public header file, but y

Re: testsuite under wine

2022-12-21 Thread NightStrike via Gcc
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:38 PM Jacek Caban wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I'm responsible for Wine changes that cause your problems. I'm also > CCing Eric, who is Wine console expert, maybe he has better ideas. Eric, > see [1] if you're interested in the context. > > > Recent Wine versions implement W

Re: -minstd: Require a minimum std version, without being specific

2022-12-21 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 19:33:48 +0100, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > I've long had this wish: an option similar to -std, but which would not > specify > the standard. Rather, mark a requirement that the standard be at least a > version. > > This would be especially useful for libraries,

Re: testsuite under wine

2022-12-21 Thread Jacob Bachmeyer via Gcc
NightStrike wrote: [...] Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've generally come to think that that part isn't Wine and is instead either the testsuite or deja. So I'll keep those replies to Jacob's previous message. Most likely, it is a combination of the MinGW