Hi David,
> I think Nathan might've been asking not only about what currently
happens, but what we think should happen?
Yes.
> Is that consistent with `-o`? (I assume so, but don't know - I guess
there aren't many cases where `-o` is unused (maybe `-fsyntax-only`),
so that behavior might be a bit l
I have update the fix to this one:
diff --git a/gcc/df-core.cc b/gcc/df-core.cc
index a901b84878f..cc6383990a1 100644
--- a/gcc/df-core.cc
+++ b/gcc/df-core.cc
@@ -1437,7 +1437,16 @@ df_analyze_loop (class loop *loop)
df_set_blocks (blocks);
BITMAP_FREE (blocks);
- df_analyze_1 ();
+ /* I
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:37 AM Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
wrote:
>
> I have update the fix to this one:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/df-core.cc b/gcc/df-core.cc
> index a901b84878f..cc6383990a1 100644
> --- a/gcc/df-core.cc
> +++ b/gcc/df-core.cc
> @@ -1437,7 +1437,16 @@ df_analyze_loop (class loop *
Hi Richard,
Sorry for my misunderstanding. I am calling the df_analyze() instead
of df_analyze1() at the end. Shouldn't df_analyze take care and
compute the correct postorder (df-core.cc:1273) ?
Thank you,
Claudiu
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:06 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 a
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 12:30 PM Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry for my misunderstanding. I am calling the df_analyze() instead
> of df_analyze1() at the end. Shouldn't df_analyze take care and
> compute the correct postorder (df-core.cc:1273) ?
The point of df_ana
Hi all,
Tomorrow's meeting will be canceled, since there was few new topics to discuss.
The next RISC-V GNU Toolchain meeting is collecting.
Please let me know if you have any topics want to discuss in the next meeting.
Best Regards,
Jiawei
Hi,
Would you be interested in obtaining the Energy Exchange 2022 attendance
database?
Facility managers, Fleet managers, Water managers, State resource managers,
City planners, Procurement officers, Building commissioners, Project
implementation specialists, Energy auditors, Compliance man
Hello all,
As I mentioned before, I don't have much time to contribute.
So is there any way I can contribute some medium project I can work on but
myself in the long run? I loved this community, I contributed before so can
you suggest some work for me?
Mohamed
At line 276, lra_assert (spill_class != NO_REGS); would trigger
whenever execution reached here with spill_class equal to NO_REGS.
Seems to me that would never happen. Because one of the conditions in
the if statement right above it (line 265) catches spill_class ==
NO_REGS and causes the rest of t
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:56 AM chuanqi.xcq wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> > I think Nathan might've been asking not only about what currently
> happens, but what we think should happen?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Is that consistent with `-o`? (I assume so, but don't know - I guess
> there aren't many cases where `
> Am 14.12.2022 um 18:28 schrieb G.T. via Gcc :
>
> At line 276, lra_assert (spill_class != NO_REGS); would trigger
> whenever execution reached here with spill_class equal to NO_REGS.
> Seems to me that would never happen. Because one of the conditions in
> the if statement right above it (li
I'm missing something from this discussion. IIUC the claim is that these 2 new
options -fmodule-output{,=NAME} are for build systems that want to specify the
module output file.
But how do they specify the mapping from module/header-unit name to CMI, so that
imports work?
Is this really a c
Hi,
I was rewriting the strncat(3) manual page, and when I tried to compile the
example program, I got a surprise from the compiler.
Here goes the page:
strncat(3) Library Functions Manual strncat(3)
NAME
strncat - concatenate a null‐padded chara
On 12/14/22 23:45, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi,
I was rewriting the strncat(3) manual page, and when I tried to compile the
example program, I got a surprise from the compiler.
Here goes the page:
strncat(3) Library Functions Manual strncat(3)
NAME
On 12/14/22 23:51, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On 12/14/22 23:45, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi,
I was rewriting the strncat(3) manual page, and when I tried to compile the
example program, I got a surprise from the compiler.
Here goes the page:
strncat(3) Library Functions
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:46 PM Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was rewriting the strncat(3) manual page, and when I tried to compile the
> example program, I got a surprise from the compiler.
>
> Here goes the page:
>
>
>strncat(3) Library Functions Manual
[CC += groff]
Hi Andrew,
On 12/14/22 23:57, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:46 PM Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha
wrote:
Hi,
I was rewriting the strncat(3) manual page, and when I tried to compile the
example program, I got a surprise from the compiler.
Here goes the page:
Hi Nathan,
> But how do they specify the mapping from module/header-unit name to CMI, so
> that
> imports work?
>
> Is this really a clang-specific mechanism, as it has no module mapper ATM
> (IIUC)?
Yes, clang doesn't have a module mapper. And I remember Iain said he want to
introduce these op
Seriously? You UNIX folks are completely clueless about usability! It would
have been far easier to supply a built-in or separate utility to
automatically collect all the pertinent source files with the option of
mailing them to you. It also wouldn't be half as backward if you didn't
make me read a
> On 15 Dec 2022, at 05:58, chuanqi.xcq wrote:
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> > But how do they specify the mapping from module/header-unit name to CMI, so
> > that
> > imports work?
> >
> > Is this really a clang-specific mechanism, as it has no module mapper ATM
> > (IIUC)?
>
> Yes, clang doesn't h
20 matches
Mail list logo
