DejaGnu: flags via 'RUNTESTFLAGS' overriding those specified in test cases

2022-09-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2022-02-04T13:09:29+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc wrote: > On 2/4/22 08:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2022-02-03T13:35:55+, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" >> wrote: >>> while iterating over dimensions { -mptx=3.1 , -mptx=6.3 } x { >>> GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0, }. >> >> Do you us

Re: DejaGnu: flags via 'RUNTESTFLAGS' overriding those specified in test cases

2022-09-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 14:50, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2022-02-04T13:09:29+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc wrote: > > On 2/4/22 08:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> On 2022-02-03T13:35:55+, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" > >> wrote: > >>> while iterating over dimensions { -m

Re: DejaGnu: flags via 'RUNTESTFLAGS' overriding those specified in test cases

2022-09-28 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:12:23PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Which version of Dejagnu are you using? There was a fix in 6.1 or 6.2 > to change the order that the RUNTESTFLAGS and dg-options get added to > the command line. > > It's a pain to make the testsuite work consistently for both old

Re: commit signing

2022-09-28 Thread Ulrich Drepper via Gcc
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:07 PM Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:31 PM Richard Biener > wrote: > >> How does this improve supply chain security if the signing happens >> automagically rather than manually at points somebody actually >> did extra verification? > > > It works only

Re: GNU Tools Cauldron 2022

2022-09-28 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi, On 9/16/22 00:47, Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote: Hello, Hello, We are pleased to invite you all to the next GNU Tools Cauldron, taking place in Paris on September 16-18, 2022. We are looking forward to meet you again after three years! As for the previous instances, we have setup a wiki page

Re: GNU Tools Cauldron 2022

2022-09-28 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 9/28/22 10:03, Vineet Gupta wrote: We are pleased to invite you all to the next GNU Tools Cauldron, taking place in Paris on September 16-18, 2022.  We are looking forward to meet you again after three years! As for the previous instances, we have setup a wiki page for details: https://gcc.g

Handling of main() function for freestanding

2022-09-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
As part of implementing a C++23 proposal [1] to massively increase the scope of the freestanding C++ standard library some questions came up about the special handling of main() that happens for hosted environments. As required by both C++ (all versions) and C (since C99), falling off the end of t

Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project

2022-09-28 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:05 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > Carlos O'Donell and I are proud to announce and provide more detail about > the GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project. > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q3/018896.html > > Thanks, David > The minutes from the first GTI TAC m

Re: Handling of main() function for freestanding

2022-09-28 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:17 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > As part of implementing a C++23 proposal [1] to massively increase the > scope of the freestanding C++ standard library some questions came up > about the special handling of main() that happens for hosted > environments. > > As r