On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:34 AM Dave Blanchard wrote:
>
> At some point between GCC 9 and GCC 12, the preprocessor started behaving
> differently. Before if GCC were launched as /lib/cpp or /usr/bin/cpp (I
> think) it would assume the user wanted to preprocess something and
> automatically laun
> As you can see, I use both illumos as and ld, but I also tried using gnu as
> with the same result. I also tried using gnu ld (which is not recommended
> on a sparc build, AFAIK), but that brought in different problems earlier.
> Anyone can help?
Using GNU as + Solaris ld is the recommended com
Hi,
Looking for feedback on the adding new attribute to function calls that will
help create safer vararg functions.
Consider the case where a vararg function takes list of arguments of the same
type. In my case, there are terminated with a sentinel of null.
Char *result = delimitedstr(‘:’ “fo
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 11:17, Yair Lenga via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looking for feedback on the adding new attribute to function calls that will
> help create safer vararg functions.
>
> Consider the case where a vararg function takes list of arguments of the same
> type. In my case, there are t
The first release candidate for GCC 10.4 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.4.0-RC-20220621/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.4.0-RC-20220621/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
r10-10862-g3c390f4ad27c3d79fd1817276a6d3217fd9bfb51.
I
Well we got gcc's verbose but in the we need ld's. Should be something like
-Wl,-v
If someone actually knew offhand which linker script template of used in
this cases it would help. I don't and always have to dig.
--joel
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 12:09 PM Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Thanks! This is w
Status
==
The GCC 10 branch is frozen for the release of GCC 10.4 with
a first release candidate published. All changes require
release manager approval.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- ---
P1
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:28:00 +0200
Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:34 AM Dave Blanchard wrote:
> >
> > At some point between GCC 9 and GCC 12, the preprocessor started behaving
> > differently. Before if GCC were launched as /lib/cpp or /usr/bin/cpp (I
> > think) it would a
Hello,
I noticed that several division related routines provided by libgcc such
as __divdi3, __moddi3 and __umoddi3 have references to _Unwind_Resume
for the sparc-rtems target. For example:
.file "libgcc2.c"
! GNU C17 (GCC) version 13.0.0 20220621 (experimental) [master
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that several division related routines provided by libgcc such as
> __divdi3, __moddi3 and __umoddi3 have references to _Unwind_Resume for the
> sparc-rtems target. For example:
That is because:
ifeq ($(LIB2_
On 21/06/2022 15:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that several division related routines provided by libgcc such as
__divdi3, __moddi3 and __umoddi3 have references to _Unwind_Resume for the
sparc-rtems target. For exampl
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index b6dcc45a58a..04631f737ea 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -1269,6 +1269,7 @@ ANALYZER_OBJS = \
analyzer/region-model-reachability.o \
analyzer/sm.o \
analyzer/sm-file.o \
+ analyzer/sm-fd.o \
analyzer/sm-malloc.o \
This is a patch for extending static analysis support for posix file
descriptor APIs which is a part of my GSoC project. I've written a few
testcases, which are all passing. There are a few TODOs like adding the
copyright header and adding docs to gcc/doc/invoke.texi.
I'm looking for suggestions
Hi Immad, thanks for this patch.
Overall, looks like you're making good progress.
Various notes and nitpicks inline below, throughout...
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 22:00 +0530, Mir Immad wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/analyzer.opt b/gcc/analyzer/analyzer.opt
> index 23dfc797cea.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
> So ultimately that's something we want to fix, though exactly how, I'm
> not quite sure; we presumably want to look up the target's definitions
> of those macros - but I don't think the analyzer has access to the
> cpp_reader instance from the fr
Hello folks,
I am not subscribed to this mailing list, so please address
responses directly to me.
I have a program that generates this error:
.c: In function ‘f0’:
.c:117:4: error: this ‘else’ clause does not guard...
[-Werror=misleading-indentation]
117 | //#en
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:31, thutt--- via Gcc wrote:
>I am here to solicit ideas on how to further narrow this this
>down. Is there any undocumented option that I can use to cause the
>standalone preprocessor to produce output identical to input?
>Note that '-traditional-cpp' doe
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, 20:35 Jonathan Wakely, wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:31, thutt--- via Gcc wrote:
> >I am here to solicit ideas on how to further narrow this this
> >down. Is there any undocumented option that I can use to cause the
> >standalone preprocessor to produce out
On 6/21/22 6:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 10.4 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.4.0-RC-20220621/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.4.0-RC-20220621/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
r10
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> âs External Email
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:31, thutt--- via Gcc wrote:
> >I am here to solicit ideas on how to further narrow this this
> >down. Is there any undocumented option that I can use to cause the
> >standalone preprocessor to produce out
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 18:50 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
>
> > So ultimately that's something we want to fix, though exactly how,
> > I'm
> > not quite sure; we presumably want to look up the target's
> > definitions
> > of those macros - but I don
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
> Joseph: is the target hook the way to go with this? Would it look
> something like:
>
> DEFHOOK (fd_access_mode, "FIXME", int (int))
>
> taking the build configuration's O_ access mode, and returning the
> target configurations's access mode (
On Sat Jun 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM CEST, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 22:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > >
> >
> > I have resent the patch us
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 22:00 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> On Sat Jun 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM CEST, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 22:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
