On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 14:50 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 23:22 +0530, Mir Immad wrote:
> > HI everyone,
> >
> > I'm Immad Mir -- one of the GSoC students this year. I'll be working
> > on
> > adding static analysis support for POSIX file description APIs this
> > summer.
>
Hello,
this variable doesn't take value. It's always zero.
Is this intended?
Mohamed
Sorry i found it in affinity-fmt.c
في الخميس، ١٦ يونيو، ٢٠٢٢ ٥:٤١ م Mohamed Atef
كتب:
> Hello,
>this variable doesn't take value. It's always zero.
> Is this intended?
>
> Mohamed
>
I cant't get the value of "gomp_affinity_format_let" I used the plugin but
it only gives 0 value. if you noticed in the gompd_get_affinity_format i
used 100 for the length of the affinity format.
Mohamed.
في الخميس، ١٦ يونيو، ٢٠٢٢ ٥:٤٦ م Mohamed Atef
كتب:
> Sorry i found it in affinity-fmt.c
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 06:00:47PM +0200, Mohamed Atef wrote:
> I cant't get the value of "gomp_affinity_format_let" I used the plugin but
> it only gives 0 value. if you noticed in the gompd_get_affinity_format i
> used 100 for the length of the affinity format.
gomp_affinity_format_len is just a
Snapshot gcc-10-20220616 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20220616/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hello,
A colleague patched a prod-critical bug today caused by an overlooked implicit
int promotion when adding uint8_t's. g++ (v12.1) doesn't report any warnings
for it with all combinations of warnings flags that I've tried, so I thought
I'd ask if:
- there *is* already some combination of
Apologies, I didn't realize that my mail client doesn't
auto-wrap. Please find a wrapped copy of my original message below my
signature.
-Ani
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022, at 9:11 PM, Aniruddh Agarwal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A colleague patched a prod-critical bug today caused by an overlooked
> implicit in
