Hi Jonathan,
On 6/11/22 00:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Well, I'd argue the same reasons to remove it from C++. Don't know how
useful that feature is for C++, though. I bet not much, but am not an
expert in the language.
It's used in libstdc++ because I couldn't get an attribute to
On 6/11/22 11:03, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 6/11/22 00:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Well, I'd argue the same reasons to remove it from C++. Don't
know how
>> useful that feature is for C++, though. I bet not much, but am
not an
>> expert in the langua
On Sat, 11 Jun 2022, 10:00 Alejandro Colomar,
wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 6/11/22 00:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Well, I'd argue the same reasons to remove it from C++. Don't know
> how
> > useful that feature is for C++, though. I bet not much, but am not
> an
> > expert in the
On 6/11/22 14:08, Gabriel Ravier wrote:
> Do we want to add a completely unnecessary feature, just for symmetry
with C++, even if it poses a danger of breaking (both human and script)
readability of function declarations/definitions, especially when hidden
in macros?
I actually don't get th
Snapshot gcc-12-20220611 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20220611/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 01:39, Miika via Gcc wrote:
>
> Based on Jakub's and Yair's comments I created a new attribute "inrange".
> Inrage takes three arguments, pos min and max.
> Pos being the argument position in the function, and min and max defines the
> range of valid integer. Both min and max
