Hi, Joseph!
I'd like to suggest a change in C2x regarding attributes.
Right now, the draft allows function attributes to go right at the
beginning of a function prototype, or just before the opening parenthesis:
[[attr]] type f(params);
type f [[attr]](params);
I'd argue against the second o
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> I'd like to suggest a change in C2x regarding attributes.
The attribute syntax is supposed to accept attributes in exactly the
places they are accepted in C++ (and appertaining to the same entity, for
each such place), for constructs prese
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> So, could you please drop that from C2x?
No!
For one it diverges from C++, but also it means something different
at the different locations.
[[attr0]] void foo (void), bar (void);
appertains to both declarations, while
v
[I reordered some of your answers, to better answer]
Hi Jakub,
On 6/10/22 23:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
So, could you please drop that from C2x?
No!
[[attr0]] void foo (void), bar (void);
appertains to both declara
Hi Joseph,
On 6/10/22 23:09, Joseph Myers wrote:
P.S.: The latest draft that I know of is N2731. I guess there are newer ones.
Could you please name the latest one?
It's N2912 (June 8 version - the version originally published on June 7
had various problems; there are still some issues, espec
I've written a large new chunk of documentation for my GCC newbies
guide, called "Diving into GCC internals", which can be seen at:
https://gcc-newbies-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/diving-into-gcc-internals.html
Hope this is helpful; please let me know if you see any mistakes, or if
there's roo
Snapshot gcc-11-20220610 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20220610/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, 22:29 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc,
wrote:
> [I reordered some of your answers, to better answer]
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On 6/10/22 23:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
> wrote:
> >> So, could you please drop that from C2
> Hope this is helpful; please let me know if you see any mistakes, or if
> there's room for improvement
Nice work! In the "inside cc1" chapter, I think that IR is usually meant for
"Intermediate Representation" rather than "Internal Representation" in this
context.
--
Eric Botcazou
> On 10 Jun 2022, at 22:58, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
>
> I've written a large new chunk of documentation for my GCC newbies
> guide, called "Diving into GCC internals", which can be seen at:
>
> https://gcc-newbies-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/diving-into-gcc-internals.html
>
> Hope thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
