Re: passing command-line arguments, still

2022-03-17 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:45:33 -0400 Marek Polacek wrote: Hi Marek, > Let's avoid -f-foo; use -ffoo instead, like the rest of GCC. Sure. I hadn't noticed the distinction. > > In cobol/lang.opt, I have: > > > > indicator-column > > Make this 'findicator-column='. Does that help? Yes, with t

Query regarding GSoC

2022-03-17 Thread Riva Malthiyar via Gcc
Respected mentor, I am Riva Malthiyar from India. I am experienced in C/C++. I saw the list of projects in your GSoC project ideas and wish to work in one of them. In the "Before You Apply" Section there is something related to compiler, I did not understand that point. What kind of compiler is nee

Re: passing command-line arguments, still

2022-03-17 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 16:22, James K. Lowden wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:45:33 -0400 > Marek Polacek wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > Let's avoid -f-foo; use -ffoo instead, like the rest of GCC. > > Sure. I hadn't noticed the distinction. There are no existing options of the form -f-foo, only -f

Re: Query regarding GSoC

2022-03-17 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 1:39 PM Riva Malthiyar via Gcc wrote: > > Respected mentor, > I am Riva Malthiyar from India. I am experienced in C/C++. I saw the list > of projects in your GSoC project ideas and wish to work in one of them. In > the "Before You Apply" Section there is something related t

Re: passing command-line arguments, still

2022-03-17 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022, James K. Lowden wrote: > That's good to know; at least you're not telling me it's horribly out > of date. I am puzzled, though, because AFAICT that document doen't > indicate why a leading "f" or trailing "=" controls whether or not an > option taking an argument is passed to

Re: passing command-line arguments, still

2022-03-17 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:21:36PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:45:33 -0400 > Marek Polacek wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > Let's avoid -f-foo; use -ffoo instead, like the rest of GCC. > > Sure. I hadn't noticed the distinction. > > > > In cobol/lang.opt, I have: > > >

gcc-9-20220317 is now available

2022-03-17 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-9-20220317 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20220317/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch