Hello,
I'm trying to understand ipa-bit-cp/ipa-cp and how the known bits are
propagated to the lattice in the case of a pointer_plus_expr.
I have a piece of code similar to the following (this being a simplified
example)
int main ()
{
// a = some pointer.
foo (a);
}
foo (void* a)
{
bar (a
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17 2022, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to understand ipa-bit-cp/ipa-cp and how the known bits are
> propagated to the lattice in the case of a pointer_plus_expr.
>
> I have a piece of code similar to the following (this being a simplified
> example)
>
> int mai
Thanks Martin!
The example I showed is simplified and I had not specified that I was using
LTO, but I am. Thanks for asking me to clarify this.
The issue I have with the information in the Lattice section of the dump is
that it shows the information once the analysis has achieved a fixed point.
H
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17 2022, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> Thanks Martin!
>
> The example I showed is simplified and I had not specified that I was using
> LTO, but I am. Thanks for asking me to clarify this.
>
> The issue I have with the information in the Lattice section of the dump is
> that it shows the in
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Andras Tantos wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'm working on porting GCC to a new processor architecture. I think
> I've finally got to a fairly stable stage, so the next logical step
> would be to test and optimize. For that, I would need some benchmarks,
> and this is where I'm seeki
> If I understand you correctly, that is indeed the jump function,
> obtainable through ipa_get_ith_jump_func (args, i) where args is a
> result of ipa_edge_args_sum->get and i is the index of the parameter.
>
Thanks Martin!
So then, am I correct in thinking that
callsite foo -> bar
param 0: PAS
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17 2022, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>> If I understand you correctly, that is indeed the jump function,
>> obtainable through ipa_get_ith_jump_func (args, i) where args is a
>> result of ipa_edge_args_sum->get and i is the index of the parameter.
>>
>
> Thanks Martin!
>
> So then, am I cor
Thanks H-P! I'll certainly check it out.
Andras
February 17, 2022 9:15 AM, "Hans-Peter Nilsson" wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022, Andras Tantos wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I'm working on porting GCC to a new processor architecture. I think
>> I've finally got to a fairly stable stage, so the nex
Snapshot gcc-9-20220217 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20220217/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
