Hi Richard,
> On 20 Jan 2022, at 22:32, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> Iain Sandoe writes:
>>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 10:46, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrot>> An alternative might be to make promote_function_arg a “proper”
>>> ABI hook, taking a cumulative_args_t and a function_arg_info.
>>> Perhaps the
Iain Sandoe writes:
> Hi Richard,
>> On 20 Jan 2022, at 22:32, Richard Sandiford
>> wrot>> Iain Sandoe writes:
On 10 Jan 2022, at 10:46, Richard Sandiford
wrot>> An alternative might be to make promote_function_arg a “proper”
ABI hook, taking a cumulative_args_t and a function_
Am Dienstag, den 18.01.2022, 09:31 +0100 schrieb Richard Biener:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:11 PM Michael Matz via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Martin Uecker wrote:
> >
> > > > Because it interferes with existing optimisations. An explicit
> > > > checkpoint has a clear me
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:56:59PM -0600, Noah Goldstein wrote:
> The goal is that the new interfaces will be usable as an optimization
> by compilers if a program uses the return value of the non "eq"
> variant as a boolean.
So I'm curious, but can you demonstrate that it can be implemented
notac
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:51 PM Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:56:59PM -0600, Noah Goldstein wrote:
> > The goal is that the new interfaces will be usable as an optimization
> > by compilers if a program uses the return value of the non "eq"
> > variant as a boolean.
>
>
Snapshot gcc-10-20220121 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20220121/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
