On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 9:04 PM Nayan Deshmukh via Gcc
> wrote:
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > struct A {
> > int a;
> > uint64_t b;
> > int c = -1;
> > };
>
> The question becomes is the above a standard layout class or
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 9:04 PM Nayan Deshmukh via Gcc
> >wrote:
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > struct A {
> > > int a;
> > > uint64_t b;
> > > int c = -1;
> > > };
> >
> > The question becomes is the above
Hello.
I would like to ping this as Joel wrote that we'll be switching
to Python3. I know there are some scripts that are definitely in Python 2
and I would like to port it.
Having a git repo seems to me the only reasonable way doing that.
Can we please set it up?
Cheers,
Martin
On 5/24/21 09:
Hi,
looking at what the REAL(KIND=17) numbers should be compiled for, I see
the following options that should be considered:
a) xsaddqp and friends are not supported by the CPU; libquadmath should
be called for all operations, including simple arithmetic.
b) xsaddqp and friends are support
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
> I would like to ping this as Joel wrote that we'll be switching
> to Python3. I know there are some scripts that are definitely in Python 2
> and I would like to port it.
Scripts in hooks-bin are executed in separate processes, not imported into
the sam
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:29:16PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> looking at what the REAL(KIND=17) numbers should be compiled for, I see
> the following options that should be considered:
>
> a) xsaddqp and friends are not supported by the CPU; libquadmath should
>be called for all
Hello,
This case is primarily to collect and track vulnerability status for
CVE-2021-44228, the Apache Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability. We
will be collecting public advisories and other information, but as usual would
appreciate status updates and public references.
View Online:
